131–140 of 519 posts
Is it realistic to make use of this on the command line, feeding it my own images? Or has someone wrapped it in an app or online service?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t know anybody that is blown away by keyboard auto suggest. It’s wrong as often as it is right. Not saying it isn’t useful, but let’s not oversell it.
> Impressive isn't it! >> Yeah! Don't they make a trillion dollars a year? How is it so crappy?
Edit: Looks like AUTOMATIC1111 can merge three checkpoints. I still don't know how it works technically, but I guess that's how it's done?
Hopefully related: If I'm a photographer wanting to improve resolution of my content for printing, what's my current best bet for upscaling? Is it realistic to make use of this on the command line, feeding it my own images? Or has someone wrapped it in an app or online service?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They know they are going to be the next target in the war on general purpose computing. They're trying to stave it off for as long as possible by signalling to the authorities that they are the good guys. A confrontation is inevitable, though. Right now it costs moderate sums of money to do this level of training. Not always will this be so. If I were an AI-centric organization, I would be racing to position myself a…
I am not clicking that link because no one should take the risk of you proving your point of what horrors could pop out of one of these models. I will say that while the government backlash is inevitable just like it was with encryption, these image generation models are so easy to train on consumer hardware that the cat is hopelessly out of the bag. It might as well be thoughtcrime.
Hopefully related: If I'm a photographer wanting to improve resolution of my content for printing, what's my current best bet for upscaling? Is it realistic to make use of this on the command line, feeding it my own images? Or has someone wrapped it in an app or online service?
Couldn't we train a very good model by distributing the dataset along with the computing power using something similar to folding@home?
I just thought about this, so bare in mind that I don't know much of the technical implications of this, but: Couldn't we train a very good model by distributing the dataset along with the computing power using something similar to folding@home?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Porn has driven many tech advances. I predict that models trained on specific porn genres will appear as soon as training a good model is doable for under $5000. They’ll get here much quicker if we get video to that mark first.
> Porn has driven many tech advances. This is an urban myth.