Live data from Hacker News

The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

paullukas.substack.com

131–140 of 238 posts

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#131
post #7

How soon until we see AI-powered adblockers that filter the output of any signal to remove anything that it perceives as an ad?

Dust off my old response to "augmented reality": subtractive reality. I originally thought of it as "subtracting out annoying people" but "subtracting out ads" is much more compelling.

There was a Black Mirror episode which included that. It started off simple: a mother subtracting a scary dog from the view of her young daughter.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#132
post #119
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was shocked as a non-hockey fan to see an ad of a car driving along the wall during active play. My eyes instinctively moved to the ad away from the puck. It was gross. As an NBA fan, I hate how ads keep getting crammed into every piece of equipment on the court, the jerseys, etc.

Quoted post unavailable.

Please drink a verification can before posting.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#133
post #119
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was shocked as a non-hockey fan to see an ad of a car driving along the wall during active play. My eyes instinctively moved to the ad away from the puck. It was gross. As an NBA fan, I hate how ads keep getting crammed into every piece of equipment on the court, the jerseys, etc.

Quoted post unavailable.

...and?

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#134
post #119
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was shocked as a non-hockey fan to see an ad of a car driving along the wall during active play. My eyes instinctively moved to the ad away from the puck. It was gross. As an NBA fan, I hate how ads keep getting crammed into every piece of equipment on the court, the jerseys, etc.

Quoted post unavailable.

It's easy to still be a fan, but hate what they are changing.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#135
post #4

The digital boards in hockey can get really annoying even when they're working as intended. Animating them should definitely be banned and I wouldn't mind seeing the digital ads disappear entirely.

It's even worse when the hockey players' white uniforms confuse the video effect algorithm into thinking the uniforms are part of the board and the algorithm paints the uniform with part of the ad. see https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/nhl-fans-are-already-fed-up...

> "Like anything else, you're going to have your people that don't like it, that think it is difficult to watch. But over time, like everything else, people will get used to it, and we're not concerned at all whatsoever," Keith Wachtel, the NHL's chief business officer and executive vice president of global partnerships, told ESPN ahead of the season.

Wow. That statement is dripping with contempt for their viewers. It sucks that these huge sports leagues have little in the way of competition.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#136
post #13
post #7

How soon until we see AI-powered adblockers that filter the output of any signal to remove anything that it perceives as an ad?

Several TV models already incorporate that feature. If your device is supported, your remote should have a button conforming to the IEC 60417-5009 standard to activate it.

that method is particularly painful now that we're in the era of the booting-TV.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#137
The Mute button on the remote is surprisingly useful for this (but not if they overlay the regular programming, obviously). The sound is a big part of why we hate the ads.

You'd be amazed how un-annoying it is to watch commercials with the sound off. Sometimes you watch and wonder what it's actually an ad FOR.

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#138
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey, do you have a good way to communicate this to normies? I haven't had any luck explaining to my wife that advertisements are basically a sort of cancerous meme designed to deliver misinformation and manipulate you into wasting your money on products that focus more on self-promotion than quality or value. I just sound like a jerk and she somehow takes it as a personal attack

I sometimes have trouble explaining this to others without coming off as a jerk as well. I think the thing to do is to focus on yourself rather than the person you're talking to: instead of saying to someone that ads are "designed to manipulate you ", say that they're "designed to manipulate, and I know that I'm not always strong enough to resist being swayed to want to buy something I don't actually want or need". F…

The really nasty side of advertising is the collateral damage of mental health issues, eg death by the torture of annorexia is just one. I find it's usually pretty easy to get some kind of agreement on that even if we agree we are not suceptible at the moment and how making the audience of the ads feel inadequate (so we spend money on something to feel better) is the point. Perfume advertised by perfet movie stars and models who are better and happier than you. It doesn't have to be a conspiracy, as a society we've thrown every ad strategy against the wall and selected for the ones that work and this one works so we use it, don't know or care it harms a vulnerable 12 year old. Ad exec doing lines off the boardroom table may not even be smart enough to abuse your children deliberately but _can_ copy this other thing that worked. "No fat women in coke ads." Needn't be a malicious agency or "obesity vendor" policy for it to actually be put into effect and be happening. (It could be policy too, who would trust them not to be vile?)

So that's the obvious end and you can see pretty easily how it exists all the way up the spectrum from the extremely serious effects through to the utterly "well thats 30 seconds I'm never getting back" level of trivial.

The advertising industry has no regard for you or your family's or your community's mental health. None. This is clear to me and you can form your own view. Given I believe that, we have to run defence. And you do, I do, everyone does. "Kids, that is fake, that isn't real." If you never had a discussion like that with younger humans, be they your kids, extended family, friends or randoms then, I kind of wonder why not? How much defence should we be playing against it all? As much as we can is my answer. It's wrong not to make some kind of effort.

Where are you drawing the line for the health and welfare of your family?

Re: The Bucks can’t wear cream uniforms because they interfere with digital ads

#139
post #35
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's already happened ... just look at how many youtube channels have integrated a "and now let's briefly talk about my sponsors" segment in the middle.

This is how ads were in the beginning of television, the characters in the snow would talk about the product.

Like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGDgnp7-uck

("Is that a PS Vita" in the middle of a dramatic, slow-paced show)

Post reply on HN