Live data from Hacker News

NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

iapps.courts.state.ny.us

131–140 of 443 posts

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#131
post #121

I can understand why the vaccine mandate would be unconstitutional as a whole, but why shouldn't the city be allowed to fire whoever they feel like firing? New York is an at will state.

"At will" doesn't mean you can fire for any reason.

Even if you don't state the reason (which they did), it would be illegal to fire all black people from a company, because it's trivial to prove for a large enough company.

"at will" doesn't supercede civil rights act and other laws.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would it make sense to exempt those people but not, say, firefighters?

Because athletes and performers are irreplaceable and bring in tourist revenue which the city wants. Firefighters are more easily replaceable and have no effect on tourism. Having competing priorities is common enough, I don't see what doesn't make sense here. The city wants everyone to be vaccinated but it also wants broadway and basketball to be happening more, so they came up with this policy.

Why do firefighters have no effect on tourism? Without them you can not run a city. Same for many other jobs like garbage collection.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#133
post #82

I've been thinking a lot about judicial review in common law democracies recently, and I tentatively think a better system would be to vastly expand the number of judges that are involved in making a decision. Example, you'd still have a tiered court system, and your case would still be heard in front of say a 3-9 panel appeals court- but after they write their decisions, a couple hundred other appeals judges at the…

I think that would make things more partisan, not less. Those hundreds of judges are not going to have the time to study the case in as much detail as the assigned judges, so their decisions will be based on a quick cursory reading, and their justification won't be on the record to be reviewed by higher courts. While motivated reasoning is always a concern, I would expect it to be more common in decisions made in this situation.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The argument at the time was that it was "creating a double standard that disadvantaged local artists and athletes" compared to performers that were not residents of NYC (but commuted in for work). https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/153-22/transcr...

Stuff like this and allowing certain events while vilifying others as "superspreader events" killed a lot of people's belief in mitigation strategies IMO. A virus is a virus and doesn't recognize human needs or wants. Either there are no exceptions for anyone or we shouldn't bother.

The same happened in CA with some stores being open and others closed. Why was Home Depot open? It made no sense in terms of spreading the disease . It was just arbitrary BS.

Closing the beaches was stupid too. If there ever was a safe place then it was the beach or state park wheee uou are in the open and the window blows.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#135
post #121

I can understand why the vaccine mandate would be unconstitutional as a whole, but why shouldn't the city be allowed to fire whoever they feel like firing? New York is an at will state.

"At will" doesn't mean you can fire for any reason. Even if you don't state the reason (which they did), it would be illegal to fire all black people from a company, because it's trivial to prove for a large enough company. "at will" doesn't supercede civil rights act and other laws.

This is bad faith interpretation of my comment. We all know what the Civil Rights Act is. My question is what rule exactly is NYC breaking?

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#136
post #10

Something I've been wondering in recent cases where courts are overturning recent government action, whether unconstitutional bills passed into law, or unconstitutional executive actions that overstep authority, is where's the penalty for committing those actions in the first place? The state of New York famously responded to the outcome of NYSRPA v. Bruen, which overturned the defacto ban on concealed carry, by decl…

It's a little weird to be concerned about this now around COVID policies, and not during the last fifty years of laws passed by republican state legislatures that barely last past the ink drying on the law before getting slapped with an injunction and ultimately struck down by the courts, but not after the state AG wastes millions of dollars in taxpayer funds fighting it as high up the federal court system as possibl…

Hot take to look at the oversteps of authority around covid response… and start blaming Republicans.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if the vaccine doesn't prevent spread that means you were fired because of... what? "Get the vaccine to reduce your symptoms or I'll fire you incase it kills you!" It's not like the vaccine prevents spread to other coworkers, why require it? Everyone has a different health risk, let them decide whether they can weather a certain viral load. That is, unless, you have a vaccine that can actually prevent trasmission…

A lot of people no longer believe in personal freedom. They would rather fire employees before banning tobacco and alcohol, yet tobacco and alcohol is far more dangerous and leads to more deaths than COVID-19.

I don’t take lightly how many people used covid to further their ideological… or what just so happened to align with their ideological goals and beliefs.

Some of them… well, what an amazing coincidence really!

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it doesn’t matter who has Covid in a fire.

Dunno how it is in NY, but in my city, the fire department spends way more time on paramedic duties than on actually fighting fires (around 40 EMS calls for every fire call). IMO if you're getting a ride to the hospital from someone it matters if they have COVID. And even though the vaccines don't guarantee that you won't get infected, the government does have an interest in preventing severe infections. COVID was th…

I am perfectly happy to have a COVID spewing firefighter get me to the hospital after a car accident and let me take my chances there, than to be left without a first responder. 100% of the time.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because athletes and performers are irreplaceable and bring in tourist revenue which the city wants. Firefighters are more easily replaceable and have no effect on tourism. Having competing priorities is common enough, I don't see what doesn't make sense here. The city wants everyone to be vaccinated but it also wants broadway and basketball to be happening more, so they came up with this policy.

Why do firefighters have no effect on tourism? Without them you can not run a city. Same for many other jobs like garbage collection.

Well clearly there is an elite class to whom body autonomy is granted, and an underclass who must follow arbitrary and capricious rules. OP appreciates that celebrities and entertainers are our betters and should not be held to the same standard.

Re: NY Supreme Court reinstates NYC's fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay

#140

They took people's livelyhoods away, and now they gotta pay.

They were fired for cause, namely, insubordination. The resistance to vaccination is entirely political. The mandate was not, but instead in the interests of public safety and health. Easing the mandate for special cases was a terrible decision. The decision to ease the mandate should be reversed, not the mandate itself. So quickly they've forgotten the piles of bodies of COVID victims in NYC.
Post reply on HN