131–140 of 145 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many proofs. But some people are too blind or too proud to see them. You can check out provingislam.com for a teaser.
That's as scientific as a Marvel Comic Con. That just tries to align with your bias, there isn't any science on it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The slippery slope is real. And as far as we're concerned, taking the Hijab away is one very obvious step in that direction. Just look at history. I'm not defending the Iranian regime by the way. You're straw manning to assume that the Hijab's only reason is lack of self control. It's one part of many things that we have in Islam to preserve morality and purity. For example, both men and women are ordered to lower th…
Quoted post unavailable.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> > The fact is that some men (and women) felt so threatened > No one is feeling threatened. Oh yeah? Then why did they feel compelled to kill a young woman for the "horrible crime" of not covering her hair? > You're the one projecting here. Nope, it's definitely you. All that gibbering about STDs... It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair we can see. And posting…
Why are you asking me? Did I defend the corruption of such a regime anywhere in what I wrote? In fact, I stated the opposite. The incident should be investigated, and those responsible should face justice.
> It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair we can see
No one said it is mandatory, but the results are clear for spreading immorality in the land.
Your last statement is pure bigotry and Islamophobic and racist. If you don't want to learn, I hope someone else who comes across this conversation has an open mind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many proofs. But some people are too blind or too proud to see them. You can check out provingislam.com for a teaser.
That's as scientific as a Marvel Comic Con. That just tries to align with your bias, there isn't any science on it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
> > The fact is that some men (and women) felt so threatened > No one is feeling threatened. Oh yeah? Then why did they feel compelled to kill a young woman for the "horrible crime" of not covering her hair? > You're the one projecting here. Nope, it's definitely you. All that gibbering about STDs... It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair we can see. And posting…
Religious flamewar is a hell particularly to be avoided. Please don't post anything like this to HN again.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> > The fact is that some men (and women) felt so threatened > No one is feeling threatened. Oh yeah? Then why did they feel compelled to kill a young woman for the "horrible crime" of not covering her hair? > You're the one projecting here. Nope, it's definitely you. All that gibbering about STDs... It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair we can see. And posting…
> Oh yeah? Then why did they feel compelled to kill a young woman for the "horrible crime" of not covering her hair? Why are you asking me? Did I defend the corruption of such a regime anywhere in what I wrote? In fact, I stated the opposite. The incident should be investigated, and those responsible should face justice. > It's not actually mandatory for Westerners to have unprotected sex with every woman whose hair…
I don't like to ban people for expressing contrarian points of view, but your conduct in this thread was way past unacceptable in its own right. Please don't do this again, and please avoid religious arguments generally—they just lead to hellish flamewars and are always off topic.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Edit: actually, since you have a history of doing this and ignoring our requests to stop, I've banned this account. More at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33174051.
Don't know about CIA conspiracies but I'm sure Saudi Arabians will protest Hijab mandates one day. Freedom is amazing and every human craves it at some level.
Religious flamewar is particularly hellish and particularly avoidable. Let's avoid it.
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33141230.
Don't know about CIA conspiracies but I'm sure Saudi Arabians will protest Hijab mandates one day. Freedom is amazing and every human craves it at some level.
Ah yes, the typical astounding secular definition of freedom, equating it with nakedness and vices. I’ll tell you something, the vast majority of the Saudis are proud of the Hijab and their Islamic faith that promotes purity and decency. We don’t want the western definition of “freedom” thank you very much, we’ve seen where it leads
Frankly, all the other commenters who jumped straight into the pit of hell with you are more responsible than you are, but we can't have people abusing HN this egregiously.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Quoted post unavailable.
I don't want to ban you, so please don't post anything like this to HN again—regardless of how you feel about someone else's religion.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
The possessive suggests possession - as if the men of Iran own the women of Iran, and are sovereign over them, like an autocratic government is over its subjects. You may be aware of protests currently ongoing in Iran regarding distaste for this attitude amongst “your” Iranians.