Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that doesn't mean you weren't racking up damage for the previous 10 years. > and risk of adverse events are correlated to how high and how long levels were maintained. Is there a way to measure this though. How can I tell what my current level of damage is. GP got the usual indicators into shape. Is all the 'racking up damage' reversed in OPs case ?
>Is there a way to measure this though. How can I tell what my current level of damage is. It's a cumulative thing. There are ways to ascertain the damage, but not through routine tests. >GP got the usual indicators into shape. Is all the 'racking up damage' reversed in OPs case ? Particularly in the case of cardiovascular damage like atherosclerosis and resulting kidney damage, narrowing arteries, etc, no it's not r…
Well, what are these ways.