Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is exactly it. It’s pretty remarkable that it was trained on over 100 terabytes of images and yet the model has been distilled down to only 4gb.
Then maybe we should remind about this 25,000:1 ratio when an artist complains about his copyrights being abused. The model doesn't have space to actually copy his works inside, it can only memorise the equivalent of a thumbnail from each input. A very small thumbnail, scaled down 150:1 per width and height (square root of 25000). That's like a grain of rice on the screen.
Fair use might work but maybe not? If I were to argue against it, I'd probably compare something like a recording of music vs. a MIDI file. Same raw data scaling.