131–140 of 151 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am able to generate a maximum resolution of 512x768 on my 11GB 1080Ti. This seems to use almost 100% of the available RAM.
That's weird. I cap out at 512x512 on my 16GB Ampere card. Even stepping down precision doesn't help. I wonder what's different. I use it directly from Python.
It measures memory usage as well.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh please, all the creators of these image AIs (OpenAI, Google, Midjourney, SD, etc) are being very very cautious with this stuff. It’s not going to end humanity, but it could easily lead to some really gross content that would paint the responsible organization in a bad light.
True, they are all very cautious not to let bad actors generate bad content. Where "bad actors" are defined as "people who disagree with us", and "bad content" is defined as "things we don't want to see". Needless to say, the list of bad actors never includes the authors themselves, and the list of unacceptable applications never includes anything the authors had in mind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. It goes without saying that the authors of a piece of software have the right to make the software do whatever they want, but that shouldn't stop us from recognizing that AI engineers are starting to act like megalomaniac overseers who consider it part of their mission to steer humanity…
What's creepy is the very real world that we're approaching where anyone can create porn of anyone else given a few pictures without their consent. That can cause all sorts of lasting psychological harm and other societal negative consequences. Even if this probably can't be entirely avoided, that doesn't mean that the folks developing these models are obligated to make it easy or are incorrect to take steps to avoid…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They aren’t trying to “control” users, they’re trying to minimize the amount of bad press these AIs get. The approach they took was easier than your suggestion, because their system detects NSFW content on a per output image basis… so it’s easier to output some image (rickroll) rather than put up a prompt or even skip it completely (since they also generate a grid of the resulting images). I should add that it’s also…
Yeah, it's basic survival. Technology is inherently free and driven by porn, but sometimes that can be shocking to those uninitiated, so to "protect the children", restrictions are often placed to avoid alerting the horde and reverse progresses. I think those "enlightened" should construct and share such understanding that these are the actual reasons, so to avoid us all ending up in an actual dystopia where "protect…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. It goes without saying that the authors of a piece of software have the right to make the software do whatever they want, but that shouldn't stop us from recognizing that AI engineers are starting to act like megalomaniac overseers who consider it part of their mission to steer humanity…
Don’t worry, intentionally warped faces and NSFW filters have like a month, tops
(What is silly is that DALLE2 won't let you edit a picture with a face in it, so you can't outpaint one of its own generations. But actually you can, if you crop it carefully.)
I've been using the HuggingFace diffuses repo[1] with 6GB of VRAM fine. It's well engineered, maintainable and with decent installation process. The branch in this PR[2] adds M1 Mac support with a one line patch and it runs faster than the CompVis version (1.5 iterations/sec vs 1.4 for CompVis on a 32 Gb M1 Max, I highly recommend people switching to that version for the improved flexibility. [1] https://github.com/h…
I wouldn’t recommend using that as-is. MPS doesn’t give deterministic random number generation, which means that seeds become meaningless and you won’t ever be able to reproduce something. You can work around it by generating random numbers on the CPU and then moving them to MPS, but that probably requires a fix in PyTorch. The MPS support issue for diffusers is here: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues/2…
Copying this change fixed seeds on M1 for me.
Unfortunately the author of this PR decided to include garbage like this [1] in it, so this PR is pretty useless. [1] https://github.com/basujindal/stable-diffusion/pull/103/file...
How is that garbage? That license is part of the original SD repository, the creator Emad even talks about it in his initial post, about the OpenRAIL M License [0]: > i) The model is being released under a Creative ML OpenRAIL-M license [ https://huggingface.co/spaces/CompVis/stable-diffusion-licen... ]. This is a permissive license that allows for commercial and non-commercial usage. This license is focused on ethic…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And yes, StableDiffusion from the original repo will rick roll you if you try to generate something that triggers its NSFW filter. It goes without saying that the authors of a piece of software have the right to make the software do whatever they want, but that shouldn't stop us from recognizing that AI engineers are starting to act like megalomaniac overseers who consider it part of their mission to steer humanity…
What's creepy is the very real world that we're approaching where anyone can create porn of anyone else given a few pictures without their consent. That can cause all sorts of lasting psychological harm and other societal negative consequences. Even if this probably can't be entirely avoided, that doesn't mean that the folks developing these models are obligated to make it easy or are incorrect to take steps to avoid…
I would argue the authors went out of their way to actually make it very easy to “decensor” their model in a way that lets them wash their hands of things. So regardless of the outrage over their Puritanism, they actually have made it easier to make pornography than ever before. I don’t think applying the tiny speedbump of their model being censored by default is unreasonable in the interests of conservativism.
In the long run these men will go down in the history of pornography.