Earlier quoted context omitted.
Snap chat?
A specific medical oriented app. I’ve had a few virtual appointments where they ask me do I have an iPhone for FaceTime. I do. But what do they do for Android users? Which one of the ten soon to be discontinued Google video conferencing apps would the doctor use?
A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
131–140 of 609 posts
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's literally capitalism. It's the system that Google was allowed to thrive in and become this powerful.
Power concentration is inevitable regardless of the system because in order to enforce decentralization you would need to, well, concentrate power. Our best bet is to shame those using products of unethical companies.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Being forced to look at people's amateur porn at your job is pretty lame.
I agree, but presumably it's already necessary to determine if it's a picture of a naked adult.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#134I keep telling anyone who will listen that they need to move every aspect of their online identity away from the big tech giants, and make sure that each type of service (email, webpage, memory storage, document storage, backups, contacts, etc) is compartmentalized in such a way that if one gets removed then it wont affect the others in any way. Imagine having all your memories in the form of images and videos taken…
This event happens so rarely that it would be better advice to tell people to wear a bullet proof vest and helmet when going outside. It’s more likely to benefit them than self hosting media.
Does it though?
Also: I wear a helmet or a belt every single time I drive even for 1km. Should I not? I never needed them. 0% use rate so far for me, might as well not have done it.
The issue is that when it happens, you're done.
Considering that you probably don't need to keep all your eggs in one basket, why not at least try?
On this note, I wish providers were forced to provide a third-party backup mechanism for important data so that if I were to lose:
- the email: it could forward my email to at least receive them
- my photos: a copy could be kept on multiple hostings
etc
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#135Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#136I keep telling anyone who will listen that they need to move every aspect of their online identity away from the big tech giants, and make sure that each type of service (email, webpage, memory storage, document storage, backups, contacts, etc) is compartmentalized in such a way that if one gets removed then it wont affect the others in any way. Imagine having all your memories in the form of images and videos taken…
This event happens so rarely that it would be better advice to tell people to wear a bullet proof vest and helmet when going outside. It’s more likely to benefit them than self hosting media.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is fine as long as you don’t plan to travel to China in the future.
Please explain why this is different from traveling to any other country. I haven't been to the US since they made it legal for custom officers to search travelers' personal electronics without a warrant and deny entry if you refuse, because, thanks but no thanks.
My guess is that the "trigger" for "any other country" is much higher.
Criticize the US President all you like on every social network: not a problem.
Save a screenshot of Winnie the Pooh: you're playing with fire.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
This premise was in a Seinfeld episode: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Package_(Seinfeld) > Sheila, a clerk at the photo store, flirts with George when he picks up his photos, commenting on a mustard stain that appears in one. He photographs everything, even Jerry taking a screwdriver to his stereo, as an excuse to see her again. A lingerie model's picture is accidentally mixed in with George's photos; he assumes…
Please tell me there is a pseudo-logical-fallacy for inadvertently invoking a Seinfeld plot.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/seinfeld-effect
>The Seinfeld Effect is a phenomenon closely related to the Family Guy Effect (the idea that when a meme is referenced on a popular television show, it dies out). The Seinfeld Effect occurs when a TV show references an in-joke belonging to a subculture (in most modern cases, the Internet) and makes it mainstream, causing the show's viewership to mistakenly believe the meme originated with that show.
>The effect is named after the 1989-1998 sitcom Seinfeld's habit of referencing little-known ideas, jokes, and phrases, such as "Festivus," "yada yada yada," or "not that there's anything wrong with that," and making them extremely well-known through the show's populararity to the point that many have the misconception Seinfeld invented these phrases (for the purposes of this article, 1992 is listed as the meme origin date, as that was when the episode "The Contest" popularized the idea of masturbatory celebacy contests). [...]
Seinfeld Is Unfunny Trope:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SeinfeldIsUnfunn...
>There are certain shows that you can safely assume most people have seen. These shows were considered fantastic when they first aired. Now, however, these shows have a Hype Backlash curse on them. Whenever we watch them, we'll cry, "That is so old" or "That is so overdone".
>The sad irony? It wasn't old or overdone when they did it, because they were the first ones to do it. But the things it created were so brilliant and popular, they became woven into the fabric of that show's genre. They ended up being taken for granted, copied and endlessly repeated. Although they often began by saying something new, they in turn became the new status quo. It's basically the inverse of a Grandfather Clause taken to a trope level: rather than being able to get away with something that is seen as overdone or out of style simply because it was the one that started it, people will unfairly disregard it because it got lost amidst its sea of imitations even though it paved the way for all those imitators. That is, a work retroactively becomes a Cliché Storm. [...]
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#139> “I decided it was probably not worth $7,000,” he said.
I believe it is one of the roots of the problem. How is it even possible that getting justice in court in such a trivial case costs about three months of median income?
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will be forgotten about by tomorrow.
By many people, yes, but they'll be reminded in future discussions about trusting Google.