The author really does not do a great job, here, at least in saying something sensible as a response to DeBoer's piece. The core premise seems to be that: > I find it so very irritating that there is no term for my so-called ⸢attention deficit disorder⸣ that does not have the word “disorder” baked into it. I know what a disorder is, and this isn't one. But the author then argues against a strawman: > Why does any dev…
Or consider a game where different character classes exist e.g., Necromancer (can raise an army with no resource, quickly) and Wizard (requires lots of resources, slow to develop though some units are exceptionally strong). Would it make sense to consider being a Wizard to be a disorder in such a game?