Being in a conference, muted, hearing something that requires action, hitting "unmute", freeze for a second... bad thing.
A hardware switch would be the better option. But then people wanting to hear you cannot inform you about still being muted.
131–140 of 353 posts
Being in a conference, muted, hearing something that requires action, hitting "unmute", freeze for a second... bad thing.
A hardware switch would be the better option. But then people wanting to hear you cannot inform you about still being muted.
I feel like they're trying to make an insidious suggestion about the usage of these. IMO, there's likely a good reason - user experience. At a hardware level, grabbing the microphone can take time. Even worse that timing is inconsistent across devices, workloads, etc. That leads to a bad experience when unmuting and needing to delay your commentary. The solution to this is to keep the microphone on, but mute at a sof…
Honestly, it feels like most people here aren't reading the article. > The researchers then decided to see if they could use data collected on mute from that app to infer the types of activities taking place in the background. Using machine learning algorithms, they trained an activity classifier using audio from YouTube videos representing six common background activities, including cooking and eating, playing music…
I manage some properties for a family member on the side, one of which is in a very bad neighborhood. When I travel to this neighborhood I have a certain state of alertness that I would not normally have in my boring suburbistani neighborhood. This is better known as "situational awareness" - the man approaching me in my own neighborhood is likely a just having a friendly conversation, the man approaching me in bad neighborhood is guaranteed going to at least try to bum a smoke off me, which I don't have as I don't smoke, and will likely act belligerent if I refuse to give him money as a follow-on to the request for a smoke.
Contextually, I expect a video conferencing software to be listening to and watching me even if it doesn't necessarily reflect in the UI, it has the capability and is actively meant to do so. As such, I explicitly don't have any form of sensitive conversation in the vicinity regardless of status. On the other hand, I do not expect it to do so when not running nor my laptop to do anything similar.
Perhaps there is a legitimate criticism to be made here of poor UX around "not listening" - but to paint this as an "extremely concerning" issue is sky-is-falling critique. This over-the-top concern seems further alarmist in that both my laptop and phone display clear and obvious warnings to the user when the microphone is hot.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Honestly, it feels like most people here aren't reading the article. > The researchers then decided to see if they could use data collected on mute from that app to infer the types of activities taking place in the background. Using machine learning algorithms, they trained an activity classifier using audio from YouTube videos representing six common background activities, including cooking and eating, playing music…
> How is this not extremely concerning for anybody who cares about privacy? Because they're not actually doing that? These researchers did everything they could think of to come up with the most concerning headline. I imagine someone, somewhere is going to make a video conferencing app that closes the audio interface every time you press mute. I also expect few people will use that option because it adds additional l…
If they are, the continuing video feed is pretty likely to answer their question.
As a Deaf person, the notification annoyed the heck out of me and there are not even an option to disable the notification. I muted my mic because I am Deaf and I don't use my voice to communicate with my fellow Deaf friends over Zoom/Teams. And there is no option to disable Zoom joining-room audio (the one that when you join the room, Zoom present the option to ask which microphone you want to enable). Why would I n…
Then why mute yourself? Even more interesting: Why do you prefer to sign over video instead of typing? Are there forms of expression that are more natural that way?
Most sign at the same pace as speech. Both of which are faster than typing.
Sign language has the same, or more, expressive properties as when we use inflection etc. in voice.
I feel like they're trying to make an insidious suggestion about the usage of these. IMO, there's likely a good reason - user experience. At a hardware level, grabbing the microphone can take time. Even worse that timing is inconsistent across devices, workloads, etc. That leads to a bad experience when unmuting and needing to delay your commentary. The solution to this is to keep the microphone on, but mute at a sof…
Okay, given that they are not listening for any insidious purpose, they should all just add a legally binding, unrevokable clause to their all of their terms of service indicating that they will never sell any audio data or data derived from the audio data while the microphone is muted. Absent that, it is entirely legal for them to do so at any time for any reason with no consequences, so I see no reason why we shoul…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because a video conferencing app with a bad UX is going to be quickly supplanted with one with a better UX; the privacy concerns of being spied on by a video conferencing app while you are muted is very minute for most people. There should be a line between "companies doing whatever they want" because of some implied "nefarious" reasons, and "companies doing whatever they want" because their customers want a better e…
Because a video conferencing app with a bad UX is going to be quickly supplanted with one with a better UX For the vast majority of users, price beats UX. If a company can keep their app free by selling user data, they will out-compete paid alternatives, regardless of the UX.
Anecdotally, privacy/security seem to be on the bottom of the stack. Platform support and necessity for work are above them all.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because a video conferencing app with a bad UX is going to be quickly supplanted with one with a better UX; the privacy concerns of being spied on by a video conferencing app while you are muted is very minute for most people. There should be a line between "companies doing whatever they want" because of some implied "nefarious" reasons, and "companies doing whatever they want" because their customers want a better e…
Because a video conferencing app with a bad UX is going to be quickly supplanted with one with a better UX For the vast majority of users, price beats UX. If a company can keep their app free by selling user data, they will out-compete paid alternatives, regardless of the UX.
I feel like they're trying to make an insidious suggestion about the usage of these. IMO, there's likely a good reason - user experience. At a hardware level, grabbing the microphone can take time. Even worse that timing is inconsistent across devices, workloads, etc. That leads to a bad experience when unmuting and needing to delay your commentary. The solution to this is to keep the microphone on, but mute at a sof…
Honestly, it feels like most people here aren't reading the article. > The researchers then decided to see if they could use data collected on mute from that app to infer the types of activities taking place in the background. Using machine learning algorithms, they trained an activity classifier using audio from YouTube videos representing six common background activities, including cooking and eating, playing music…