Live data from Hacker News

If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

hbr.org

131–140 of 275 posts

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#131
"J'fais dla poudre, pour travailler plus, pour faire plus d'argent, pour faire plus de poudre, pour travailler plus, pour faire plus d'argent..."

Classic Punk song from Vulgaires Machins (Québec band), translates to: "I do coke, to work more, to make more money, to do more coke, to work more, to make more money..."

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#132
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True security is a lie, but "relatively comfortably secure for the foreseeable future" is not. These days, it takes a lot of assets to be confident you won't be homeless in old age assuming no major surprises or threats from society and the environment changing. I would say most younger people don't earn enough or have enough assets to reach that level of basic confidence. After all, if you've rented all your life so…

Thats looking it through the last generations lens where stability = a geographical location to live with a house on it. Ironically, as climate change effects become more and more prominent, going with a RV route is looking more like the best possible option for the future, cause you can just pick up and leave when bad weather comes.

If you have freedom of movement over a large area, if you don't have breakdown of law and order, if people don't start lynching others when they come into their area.

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#133
Working 70hrs a week is terrible, crushing it 70hrs a week is never enough. (shlinkedin has ruined me), but sincerely, work is inversely proportional to leverage, which implies someone working that hard doesn't have a lot of leverage. If you don't have leverage, you aren't managing well, and if you aren't managing well, that's a problem worth solving.

This seems abstract and businessy, but understanding what people mean when they use the term "leverage," in its myriad forms is a very useful concept to master.

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#134
It's possible that the most self-made successful people see wealth / money as a means to pick what they want to spend 70 hours doing rather than whether to spend 70 hours doing anything. If they want to spend 70 hours a week playing tennis so be it. Or if they want to work on a new idea they had, equally fair. It is likely that success ultimately only buys the freedom to choose where to spend your time.

I know I've worked jobs and internships which required only couple of hours a day - and I was miserable. Working >70 hours a week on my own startup has felt more rewarding than any previous job :)

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#136
post #32

Because I'm not nearly as good at any hobbies as much as I'm good at my job and being good at something is what gives me day-to-day satisfaction. Having a high wage but not enough stored wealth to feel invincible against an increasingly uncertain future, I'm spending more time feeling good about work than finding and investing in a hobby that'll make me truly happy.

I used to think that. Several decades of having my good work dumped straight into the trash bin followed by years of incredibly trivial jobs kind of beat it out of me.

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Having a high wage but not enough stored wealth to feel invincible against an increasingly uncertain future Hate to be the one to tell you this, but there is no guarantee on what the future may bring, money can't fix everything, and true security is a lie. Live your life in the here and now, before you regret wasting it.

Exactly. If society were to fall apart, the number in your bank account will matter very little, if it even exists anymore...

If society doesn't fall apart, that number could mean an awful lot.

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#138
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thats looking it through the last generations lens where stability = a geographical location to live with a house on it. Ironically, as climate change effects become more and more prominent, going with a RV route is looking more like the best possible option for the future, cause you can just pick up and leave when bad weather comes.

>going with a RV route is looking more like the best possible option for the future, cause you can just pick up and leave when bad weather comes what's the plan when fuel shortages start happening and your RV can't be kept rolling?

I wonder what the EV RV industry is looking like..

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#139
post #88
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, aren't you blessed.

Not really. Work is just a way to enrich your employer. I don't really find that all that fulfilling unless I was in an exceptional position, such as upper management in an R&D company developing revolutionary technology. But no, I'm a guy who develops insurance software for a wage. It's not bad, but it's not hard to find far more fulfilling things on my own time.

> Work is just a way to enrich your employer.

That's an awful way to look at life. Work already occupies your most productive working hours, why wouldn't you try to make it the most interesting and fulfilling activity in your life?

Re: If You’re So Successful, Why Are You Still Working 70 Hours a Week?

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ok

I used to be rather poor so the difference is more pronounced. I've enjoyed a high salary for some time now but I'm still reeling from the change. Being Canadian, I have access to public health, but if I get sick with even minor things, it'll take up my whole day. Now, if I get sick, I'll just pay the ~$200 fee to see a private doctor for 15 minutes, get what I need and get out. Dental is not covered by public health…

I also used to live in Vancouver and took transit all the time. I never needed to own a car while I lived there. Could the bus system have been better? Almost certainly, but it's still far better than other places I've lived since. How many similarly sized cities in North America can you name with better public transit?
Post reply on HN