Live data from Hacker News

China has forbidden under-18s from playing games for more than three hours/week

reuters.com

131–140 of 1001 posts

Re: China has forbidden under-18s from playing games for more than three hours/week

#134

I have mixed feelings about this. Younger me learned a lot of problem solving skills and most importantly spent a lot of time learning how to read by playing RPGs and games that required lots of reading. My reading skills would not have been as advanced if i wasn't playing text heavy games that had a lot of plot like Square Enix games and the CRPGs of the time. Modern games though are clearly designed to get you as a…

You shouldn't have mixed feelings. This is an attack on human free will.

UK lets children drink.

Re: China has forbidden under-18s from playing games for more than three hours/week

#136

I have mixed feelings about this. Younger me learned a lot of problem solving skills and most importantly spent a lot of time learning how to read by playing RPGs and games that required lots of reading. My reading skills would not have been as advanced if i wasn't playing text heavy games that had a lot of plot like Square Enix games and the CRPGs of the time. Modern games though are clearly designed to get you as a…

[deleted]

Re: China has forbidden under-18s from playing games for more than three hours/week

#137
post #8

Anyone want to argue why this would be bad, apart from restricting freedom? BTW, nothing in the article about limits on TikTok or YouTube or whathaveyougot. That's as much opium as gaming, IMO.

And offline games. I was perfectly addicted with 0 internet, thank you very much. Although I do understand that the world wasn't ever-connected back then.

Re: China has forbidden under-18s from playing games for more than three hours/week

#138
"...coaches of the Chinese Olympic volleyball teams decry this move, saying 'it will condemn our great nation to certain defeat in 2024'". /s

(Though to look at reaction here on HN, doing a 's/games/video games/' in the title would be utterly superfluous.)

Post reply on HN