Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps the most intrigueing meta observation of the monopoly game is how the players seem to never recognise how it is rigged, at least years of playing it with my cousins never revealed the didactic purpose to any of us. When we played people always took it seriously, ie that there are smart things you can do and you should do them, but we never stepped back and pointed out how the rules made the losers more and mo…
Is there a board game where one's advantage doesn't compound, though?
The Landlord's Game
131–140 of 170 posts
Re: The Landlord's Game
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
It leaves out an important piece though, inheritance. No way for you to win if there’s another player who inherits a small fortune of existing properties on the board.
Imagine playing Monopoly but one player starts with a couple properties and a little extra cash in hand. As if that game wasn't bad enough as it is.
My memory might be inaccurate.
Re: The Landlord's Game
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even Adam Smith complained about landlords though.
Adam Smith also wanted inheritance mostly abolished except for the small amount necessary to continue supporting a man's wife and young children.
This ties up a lot of wealth in ways which slow down economic growth immensely.
Re: The Landlord's Game
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
A countervailing pattern I've seen (in games with 3+ players) is that, if one player pulls into a lead, then the other players will start piling on them. Board games like Avalon Hill Civilization, Family Business, Root, etc. -- basically any game where you can choose one of your rivals to attack. Munchkin takes this to the extreme, where someone will perpetually be on the edge of winning and there are a variety of co…
Assuming your Monopoly house rules allow arbitrary contracts (if they don't, they should) the non-winning players can extend credit to each other, and allocate their combined resources very efficiently to try to beat the winner. It's very hard as a single player to beat a credit union. So the winning player will want to build some sort of alliance with at least some of the losers to make their coalition weaker, which…
The game seems to have earned a bad reputation, the prototype for the sort of game you shouldn't play anymore because everything from the last 25 years is better. I'm not sure this is deserved, but realistically my copy will probably end up collecting dust. After reading your comment, I hope not!
Re: The Landlord's Game
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
A countervailing pattern I've seen (in games with 3+ players) is that, if one player pulls into a lead, then the other players will start piling on them. Board games like Avalon Hill Civilization, Family Business, Root, etc. -- basically any game where you can choose one of your rivals to attack. Munchkin takes this to the extreme, where someone will perpetually be on the edge of winning and there are a variety of co…
Taken to an extreme, this has a 'kingmakeer' problem though, where who wins the game can often be decided by someone who has no realistic chance of winning (either by directly aiding or allying with one player, or failing to block another player).
I remember playing a 3-player game of Root (which I highly recommend!) Player A ambushed me and managed to burn down my headquarters. At that point I realized I couldn't win, and I spent the rest of the game attacking A.
A complained that I was just throwing the game to B, which is exactly what happened. The kingmaker problem made A's decision into a huge blunder. If you don't pay attention to psychology in these games, you will lose.
Re: The Landlord's Game
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps the most intrigueing meta observation of the monopoly game is how the players seem to never recognise how it is rigged, at least years of playing it with my cousins never revealed the didactic purpose to any of us. When we played people always took it seriously, ie that there are smart things you can do and you should do them, but we never stepped back and pointed out how the rules made the losers more and mo…
Is there a board game where one's advantage doesn't compound, though?
Examples include: * Innovation * Wingspan * 7 Wonders * Brass: Birmingham (and the original Brass, too)
All really fun games, too.
Re: The Landlord's Game
#137There's also https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/the-landlords-game/ (via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10685690 , but no discussion there)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1250861/
I would have liked it to dwell more on the roots and the meta-level of what the game is trying to say, and how that seems to be missed by most people who play it. But was still a fun watch on a lazy weekend day.
Streaming free on Amazon Prime right now: https://watch.amazon.com/detail?gti=amzn1.dv.gti.1cad6f64-66...
Re: The Landlord's Game
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your cabbie understands BTC you might have a point. We aren't even close to there yet
>the usual rule is that if your cabbie starts talking about it, it's time to get out of the market. >If your cabbie understands BTC you might have a point. We aren't even close to there yet The point is that the cabbie likely doesn't understand BTC. When an asset class becomes so popular that people who have no idea how it works are putting money into it and loudly campaigning for others to do the same that is a sign…
It absolutely isn't a sign a of a bubble. There aren't many people that understand what they are investing in be it currency or Google. The success of the investment has nothing to do with the cabbies understanding. Taking his advice does.
Re: The Landlord's Game
#139Every time this comes up I wonder whether the Landlord's Game can be played with a regular Monopoly set. Is it just the rules that have changed, or did the original game also contain different pieces/cards?
Re: The Landlord's Game
#140Every time this comes up I wonder whether the Landlord's Game can be played with a regular Monopoly set. Is it just the rules that have changed, or did the original game also contain different pieces/cards?
Yes, I wonder the same... The wikipedia article points to landlordsgame.info. Thereyou can also see a picture with all the cards and chips that came with it. It seems a lot. But there is no complete, printable copy of them: http://landlordsgame.info/games/lg-1906/images/lg-1906_egc-p...
Seems to be based on it. Don't know how closely it relates but it is CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 licensed and you can just download it.