Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think in the real world "No percentage of each sale payments to ARM" is what will drive RISC-V. An "open" ISA doesn't force anything else to be open. So, use cases like Western Digital, where they can quit paying ARM a percentage of every hard drive they sell, for example. As for technical advantages, each RISCV vendor has their own choice of how to implement, so it's hard to say anything broad that applies to all…
> quit paying ARM a percentage The percentage is very small, though. So this argument only works for very high volume use cases, which is why the RISC-V eval boards are currently far more expensive than comparable ARMs. Do WD do their own silicon yet, or do they just buy the parts?
See: