Live data from Hacker News

Skynet – Build a Free Internet

siasky.net

131–137 of 137 posts

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#131
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But your friends do.

If the POTUS is not using Gmail, and I'm not either, at which point does Google get to block that?

You've just made me realize network effects work both ways: If you can't receive any of your GMail friend's mail, you have a problem. If the last of your GMail friends can't receive any of their (in this example, Republican friend circle's) mail, they have a problem.

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#132
post #75
post #6

If you are using Skynet for your project, I believe you need to run a node, which will require downloading the 23GB [1] blockchain from sia. I really hope these blockchain based projects can solve the sharding problem. These blockchains are getting so big. [1] https://siastats.info/blockchain_size

Its a myth that the whole chain is needed. Comes from BTC where you need the chain to recreate all transactions. It has zero practical use. If you would consider the current state of a blockchain to be "wrong" but everyone agreed to move forward anyway you may as well call it "correct" because by definition the majority decides what is right and what not in these systems. So you dont really need to validate the whole…

>second generation blockchains

Curious: beyond XRPL, what are examples of such blockchains?

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With huge numbers of people following Trump off of Twitter, FB, et all, expect a huge hit to their stocks.

Twilio's stock took a noticeable bump upwards today.

Twitter lost 10%.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25730316

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#135
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its a myth that the whole chain is needed. Comes from BTC where you need the chain to recreate all transactions. It has zero practical use. If you would consider the current state of a blockchain to be "wrong" but everyone agreed to move forward anyway you may as well call it "correct" because by definition the majority decides what is right and what not in these systems. So you dont really need to validate the whole…

>second generation blockchains Curious: beyond XRPL, what are examples of such blockchains?

I guess there is not really a definition. Some would say PoS chains is the second generation but its arguably worse than FBA (Federated Byzantine Agreement) and its first implementation in public blockchain came way after the XRPL (FBA) already existed.

There is Stellar which is kinda a re-implementation of the XRPL with many smaller changes but its also using a FBA.

There is Flare (only test net exists at time of writing) its the first Turing-complete Federated Byzantine Agreement blockchain. Kinda the ETH 3.0. but it a new project that just used the EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) for code compatibility reasons.

Then there are DAG based "blockchains" but these are more experimental, as in no one really know if they "work" from a mathematical point of view. I would consider them to be the third generation if someone manages to fully implement it and run a public blockchain.

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#136
post #74
post #53

Am I the only one that can't download the examples, it just gets stuck. Also the dapp example throws me a json saying that skynet is blocked.

Are you in Europe by any chance? We haven't finished setting up load balancing yet and the Europe server is getting hit really hard right now. The dapp sample was blocked because it was mistaken for a phishing attempt (it's the Uniswap frontend) and Namecheap required us to block the link. Sloppy of us not to change the link to an unblocked example, we'll do that on Monday. In the meantime, here's a dapp sample: http…

Yep, I'm from Europe. After changing my vpn to the US, it started working m Thanks for the HEADS-UP, really hope this project future is less sloppy than it's lunch on HN.

Re: Skynet – Build a Free Internet

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, they've made purpose-built silicon for sia mining and it is no longer viable to mine on general purpose compute. As far as storage mining - it may be. last check (november) filecoin was the most profitable to host your disk space for but required a rediculous amount of compute as well as disk space (latest gen GPUs, 128G ram, near-100% uptime).

It's relatively early days for filecoin though. I suspect that after "we've got space and availability, see?" period, the restrictions for hosting will be relaxed.

Hopefully they loosen the coin collateral requirement for nodes also.
Post reply on HN