Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly - the energy of the released counterweight will inevitably produce an explosion as it's stopped pretty quickly by something. My question was how big an explosion. The answer is pretty big, but this probably isn't their biggest problem.
Liquid back stop? Ballistic jello?
SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
131–140 of 152 posts
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the mechanical and thermal shocks it gets when it passes from the vacuum chamber to the atmosphere. IMHO the centrifuge part is the easiest of their challenges.
That's what seems to me to be the biggest challenge too. Going from vacuum to 1 atm at 4000 mph has got to be quite a shock. Might as well just smash the thing into a wall.
Zero to Mach 5 or 6 just seems like an instantaneous disassembly manuever, both for the craft and the centrifuge itself. Did they find a way to suppress a sonic boom at the exit point?
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. I didn't want to dismiss them fast, but it did sound like the founders don't know what they're up to. Maybe they figured out some advanced materials science we don't know about, but that seems unlikely from this article. > Over the next few years, the team ran hundreds of high-speed tests. Most of them were to study and improve the system, but some were to mollify skeptical inv…
How many G is a drop on concrete?
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure how serious you are with the radioactive waste thing but I'll do the HN thing and bite (nerdsnipe!), because that's not going to work. You can't launch things into the sun, you need to decelerate objects. The earth travels at 30 km / s (70K MPH) around the sun, so you need to decelerate about that much the other way. And orbiting radioactive waste is just asking for trouble. The total amount of radioactive w…
>The earth travels at 30 km / s (70K MPH) around the sun, so you need to decelerate about that much the other way. Surely you’d just need enough to end up in a decaying orbit? Then it’ll eventually reach the sun
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#135Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#13610000g peak forces are a bit of a mess for space travel. Perhaps instead of directly spinning the object up to speed and "letting go", you could build up all of the energy into a heavy rotating mass which then imparts it into the spacecraft over a slightly longer timeframe via some simple mechanical clutch and cable arrangement. You would still have very strong g-forces, but you could control the impulse curve over t…
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assume the screen and top glass of an iPhone are 40 grams. 10000g's will make the effective mass of them 400kg. Could an iPhone survive 400kg sitting on top of it? It's definitely within the realm of possibility...
The force is acting on internal parts too. I don't think the silicon microchip inside can survive those forces. There is just too much that could go wrong here. I would be positively shocked if this thing works. I'd have to rethink a lot of things I hold an opinion on.
Re: SpinLaunch is building a centrifuge to launch satellites into orbit
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Starship development continues apace. They’re planning to launch the latest starship vehicle to 50km altitude next week and then perform their difficult landing maneuver 15km from the launch site. I believe the sweating skin idea has been dropped. See this one hour video for a detailed breakdown of the current state of the design: https://youtu.be/-8p2JDTd13k
It's being launched up to 15km, that's pretty close to 50000 feet, so you might have mixed up the units.