Earlier quoted context omitted.
Clearly is a pretty strong term. I'm sure skeptics arguing against Galileo would have used string words like "clearly" to dismiss his ideas.
>I'm sure skeptics arguing against Galileo would have used string words like "clearly" to dismiss his ideas. The fact that people dismissing Galileo's claimed turned out to have been wrong does not mean people who dismiss COVID conspiracies or reptoids are equally as likely to be wrong. People who believe in a conspiracy of globalist elite reptilian shapeshifters are clearly wrong. Clearly is a strong term, and it's…
How I talk to the victims of conspiracy theories
131–132 of 132 posts
Re: How I talk to the victims of conspiracy theories
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if the faith in God was rational? I mean to YOU it doesn't seem rational, but to the faithful it does. I mean one logical, rational argument used is that the universe and life is incredibly complicated, we as "mere" humans cannot create it, and it's incredibly unlikely humans would develop like we did. Therefore, there must be intelligent design behind it. See? Rational and logical thought. Dismissing people who…
If it were rational, it would also be falsifiable. Let me ask you: what would have to happen for you to rescind your belief? Also; at the risk of starting a discussion about religion: you haven't developed a logical argument by saying "universe is complicated -> deity". You've only moved the problem of "who or what created X" up one level to the deity. Who created the deity?
Edit: Treating rationality as something real as opposed to just a (very useful) figment of our imagination, i.e. something like a variant of Platonic Realism, is no different from any other religion.