Live data from Hacker News

Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

economist.com

131–140 of 153 posts

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#131

F1 is an extremely difficult position these days. How can a team(s) increase lap speed YoY, have competitive racing, make money, stay safe, and still have incentives for OEMs to participate? The answer is they can't. At least in the current formula. I think Bernie did a great job running the sport as a dictator, but he set up a house of cards that was doomed. I don't think Chase Carey and Liberty really had a chance.…

I've idly thought that if I was the F1 Czar I'd ban all transistors in the cars, except for in safety equipment. Not even a radio. Have the operation of the car be up to driver skill, not computer programmer virtuosity. (And I'm a programmer!) Of course, it is possible to make mechanical computers, but they are very costly to develop, heavy, take up lots of space, hard to modify, etc. Besides, it's a lost art.

Sounds like you would like NASCAR.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#132

F1 is an extremely difficult position these days. How can a team(s) increase lap speed YoY, have competitive racing, make money, stay safe, and still have incentives for OEMs to participate? The answer is they can't. At least in the current formula. I think Bernie did a great job running the sport as a dictator, but he set up a house of cards that was doomed. I don't think Chase Carey and Liberty really had a chance.…

I watch F1 for the engineering, but unfortunately it's not covered much due to the secretive nature of the sport. > The only pair of teammates on the grid right now who have any legitimate gap are Albon and Verstappen. Other than that, it's par for the course. Abon and Verstappen are no the only legitimate gaps; Leclerc vs Vettle and Ricc vs Ocon are also substantial. A better driver can take 250ms off their team mat…

I'm not sure I count Lec & Vet. Vet is leaving next year and I am sure he is a pure testing car right now. You are spot on about Ric and Oc. Ric is driving superb compared to him.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#133
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've idly thought that if I was the F1 Czar I'd ban all transistors in the cars, except for in safety equipment. Not even a radio. Have the operation of the car be up to driver skill, not computer programmer virtuosity. (And I'm a programmer!) Of course, it is possible to make mechanical computers, but they are very costly to develop, heavy, take up lots of space, hard to modify, etc. Besides, it's a lost art.

Formula 1 is meant to represent the pinnacle of technology. (Although arguably it doesn’t now, thanks to the myriad restrictions). Your idea would probably give us a great racing series, but it wouldn’t be Formula 1.

You are spot on. At the core F1 is less about racing and more about the pinnacle "formula."

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#134
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've idly thought that if I was the F1 Czar I'd ban all transistors in the cars, except for in safety equipment. Not even a radio. Have the operation of the car be up to driver skill, not computer programmer virtuosity. (And I'm a programmer!) Of course, it is possible to make mechanical computers, but they are very costly to develop, heavy, take up lots of space, hard to modify, etc. Besides, it's a lost art.

Sounds like you would like NASCAR.

Its all fun and games until you lose a couple billion in your sport from tobacco sponsors.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#135
post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like you would like NASCAR.

Its all fun and games until you lose a couple billion in your sport from tobacco sponsors.

Another poster had a YouTube link of a famous F1 driver. I couldn’t help but notice all the Marlboro advertising.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#136
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hamilton, the working class boy from Stevenage whose Dad had to work multiple jobs to support him being able to go racing in karts, is the “silver spoon boy”?

As I said, all of them have immense talent, but apart from the Red Bull-Vettel dominance era, Hamilton has always been in the best car and he was initially pushed forward by Ron Dennis of all people. I honestly can't think of anyone in F1 history who can say they were at all times backed up by people like Dennis, Fry, Lacey, Hakkinen, Wolff, Lauda from their first day in F1... No one comes even close to that. He's ha…

Maybe he was just good enough, young enough, to get people behind him? What is with this insistence on stripping him of his agency in his success? Are people threatened by it?

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#137
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would argue that Senna is the GOAT and it’s not even close. But yeh these GOAT conversations better with beers and stakes and people yelling at each other in person!

I hope you meant steaks... but agreed, this is true in any sport, there's no real way to compare across eras and in the end it's just opinion.

argh, yeah steaks :-P

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#138
post #99

Apart from watching on TV and the movies, my only brush with this world was a 1/2 day spent interviewing at McLaren in 1990. It was very clear from every engineer I talked to that they had fairly low opinion of the drivers. One of the projects we discussed was a new telemetry system, its primary purpose to allow them to prove conclusively when the driver did something stupid. I didn't take the job if anyone was curio…

McLaren’s driver duo in 1990 were Ayrton Senna and Allen Prost. Are you sure the engineers weren’t just petty little creatures trying to get some spotlight? I can assure you that no engineer could win a race against either one. Additionally, Senna has proved that he do “well” with much inferior cars, there must be something going on there as well... As someone who races every now and then for fun, I can assure you th…

Senna and Gerhard Berger in 1990. Alain Prost had switched to Ferrari.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#139

I mean this in the most respectful way: Can someone please explain the allure of watching F1 race on TV? I honestly sat down with a few friends and we watched Kimi Raikonnen but it was not a lot of action in terms of overtaking and drama - it was mostly inching forward and making time. I fully understand and appreciate the amount of skills that go into driving an F1 car, but what is in for the spectator?

F1 is more a soap opera for petrol enthusiasts. There's much better racing out there but F1 has the drama, or at least the reporting and coverage of every who said what about whom etc.

Re: Engineers, not racers, are the true drivers of success in motor sport

#140
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Give me a break, let me guess, you are not black. Since Lewis got on top I have seen this argument come up, this rubbish didn't come up in the past. This same behavior happens all the time when a black person performs very well, folks find ways to take it away.

I am Caribbean but unlike you, I don't fall for the victim hood narrative. Racism is not the reason for every issues in our community.

Sure! ... and you think it's a coincidence that this article came out now? Not last year? Not 2 years ago? Hell, not 2 months ago. What do you think is the driving force behind the article?
Post reply on HN