Live data from Hacker News

Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

amnesty.org

131–140 of 426 posts

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm old. I opted out of the order as a solution and I orbit around it making incursions of support and encouragement. Try techniques described in the Undercommons by Moten/Harney. Spend your attention carefully.

nods

Suppresses a giggle

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet you'll find that twitter only marks Russian and Chinese accounts as "state media".

To be fair, the name of the state is in BBC itself.

Last time I was in the U.S. I watched Good Morning America on the American Broadcasting Company network

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#133

I feel like the powers that be have decided to make this extradition happen. Most people don't care because they don't pay attention. Of those that do, the noisy attention payers like us, a sizeable group have decided Assange isn't likeable and so should suffer for upsetting people more powerful than him. Now we have to go through all this theatrics simply so those people can say things like "he got a fair hearing" a…

> Most people don't care because they don't pay attention.

Are you sure it's not the other way round? Additionally, I don't think it matters whether they care or pay attention. Unless the media pays attention and publishes information, they won't get anywhere.

> It's very disappointing, because the whole point of laws is that it shouldn't matter whether you're pretty or funny or sympathetic.

A cynic might say that the whole point of laws is to give the impression of justice, not to provide it.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#134

I am baffled to see that the majority of the comments here are at best showing no support for what Assange did and at worst are trying to find excuses not to be disturbed in their belief that since we are in a democracy hence everything that's happening is normal. I thought the people here had a sharper political view on what kind of society we could/should live in but I just read people that are always in a hurry to…

I do not have a good opinion of Julian Assange or of Wikileaks, and I am not afraid to say it. At best it has been an unwitting tool of Russian disinformation campaigns; just as likely it is complicit. One must also wonder why Assange spends so much time talking to folks like Sean Hannity, Dana Rohrbacher, and Charles C. Johnson. https://www.emptywheel.net/2020/09/19/wherein-wikileaks-brag...

> At best it has been an unwitting tool of Russian disinformation campaigns; just as likely it is complicit.

Aaaand there’s your reason, grandparent poster. Once the media started floating out rumors of WikiLeaks helping Orange Man, he lost all his fans on the left.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#135

I am only lurking on this but Craig Murray (ex British diplomat) has a good blog following the daily ongoings on this trial. https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/category/uncategoriz... It seems to be incredibly murky and quite frankly, pretty disturbing...

Unfortunately this is par for the course in anything the US Government does at the moment.

The UK government is basically a puppet state of the US, although they still have the pretense of independence, and they are at least paying lip service to the rule of law.

That's all his treatment is, though.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#136

I feel like the powers that be have decided to make this extradition happen. Most people don't care because they don't pay attention. Of those that do, the noisy attention payers like us, a sizeable group have decided Assange isn't likeable and so should suffer for upsetting people more powerful than him. Now we have to go through all this theatrics simply so those people can say things like "he got a fair hearing" a…

It's little events like these that expose the inner workings of the system. For all of our lip service to due process and blind justice, governments are still made up of people and the people at the top have the ability to do whatever they want with the system when they are motivated.

The sad part is that recently everyone seems to be ok with this, as long as it's working in their favor in whatever particular instance.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#137

I am baffled to see that the majority of the comments here are at best showing no support for what Assange did and at worst are trying to find excuses not to be disturbed in their belief that since we are in a democracy hence everything that's happening is normal. I thought the people here had a sharper political view on what kind of society we could/should live in but I just read people that are always in a hurry to…

Not everyone here who disagrees with you is "trying to find excuses to not be disturbed" or "in a hurry to put themselves on the good side of the stick". Your black-and-white worldview is leading you to condemn everyone who disagrees with you. Perhaps there are some who disagree with you fit your description. But as a general rule, be a lot less quick to condemn peoples' morals on the basis of their conclusions.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#138

I am baffled to see that the majority of the comments here are at best showing no support for what Assange did and at worst are trying to find excuses not to be disturbed in their belief that since we are in a democracy hence everything that's happening is normal. I thought the people here had a sharper political view on what kind of society we could/should live in but I just read people that are always in a hurry to…

I do not have a good opinion of Julian Assange or of Wikileaks, and I am not afraid to say it. At best it has been an unwitting tool of Russian disinformation campaigns; just as likely it is complicit. One must also wonder why Assange spends so much time talking to folks like Sean Hannity, Dana Rohrbacher, and Charles C. Johnson. https://www.emptywheel.net/2020/09/19/wherein-wikileaks-brag...

>"At best it has been an unwitting tool of Russian disinformation campaigns; just as likely it is complicit"

Care to show the example of disinformation disseminated by Assange?

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#139

I feel like the powers that be have decided to make this extradition happen. Most people don't care because they don't pay attention. Of those that do, the noisy attention payers like us, a sizeable group have decided Assange isn't likeable and so should suffer for upsetting people more powerful than him. Now we have to go through all this theatrics simply so those people can say things like "he got a fair hearing" a…

I can’t help but feel the media doesn’t seem to pay attention because Assange doesn’t have anything damaging against “persona non grata”.

It’s a shame really. Assange and Wikileaks has done a lot for government transparency and paid for it. Way more than the martyrs who go to rallies and complain that they’re called fake news. Who cares? Do something that gets you exiled into indefinite solitary confinement then you can have my sympathy.

In the meantime, his defenders really are motley crew. You have people from all sides, from the WWG1WGA people to amnesty internal and reporters without borders. We'll see if that's enough to pierce the walled garden of coastal and mainstream media.

Re: Why are Amnesty International monitors not able to observe the Assange hearing?

#140

I feel like the powers that be have decided to make this extradition happen. Most people don't care because they don't pay attention. Of those that do, the noisy attention payers like us, a sizeable group have decided Assange isn't likeable and so should suffer for upsetting people more powerful than him. Now we have to go through all this theatrics simply so those people can say things like "he got a fair hearing" a…

> Most people don't care because they don't pay attention. Are you sure it's not the other way round? Additionally, I don't think it matters whether they care or pay attention. Unless the media pays attention and publishes information, they won't get anywhere. > It's very disappointing, because the whole point of laws is that it shouldn't matter whether you're pretty or funny or sympathetic. A cynic might say that th…

> A cynic might say that the whole point of laws is to give the impression of justice, not to provide it.

Is there one singular "point" to laws? I feel like justifying this statement inevitably ends up at some kind of secret cabal conspiracy theory. Otherwise you have to admit that there are many groups who have many competing points and goals for legal systems.

Post reply on HN