Live data from Hacker News

How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

wsj.com

131–140 of 266 posts

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#132
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some strategy I can think of: be the first to market, market yourself as the original creator, constant innovating, other people can copy but they can't control the updates and product roadmap, and you have the advantage of intimate knowledge of the product. Another strategy is to create personalized custom solution. This would be hard to copy, unless you can copy the creator brain.

No one cares if you're the original if someone is offering the product for half the price because they paid $0 for R&D. This is a really pathetic viewpoint to hold and I wonder if you actually live your life by these standards.

Like I said, if you are the original creator you have advantage the copier doesn't have.

Another way is to provide customized personalized solution. That would be very hard to copy.

How is these pathetic?

Either way you have to adapt or left behind.

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#133

The scale of their IP theft is incredible. The CFO survey said it is happening to 1 in 5 US corporations, which is incredible if you think about it - but the trouble is the scale is larger than that, when you include what they steal via surveillance too. I can't see an answer outside of decoupling, seeing as they're set on their path and proud of it. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/28/1-in-5-companies-say-china-s...

Honestly are you really surprised? It's been going on for almost 40 years. Any exec saying they're surprised by this is disingenous at best, and lying at worst. If an exec sees a 40 year long pattern and decides to continue working with China, they're either incompetent or deciding that the potential profits are worth it.

To turn around and act surprised by this is like acting surprised that Trump keeps saying inflammatory things.

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#134
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I can't see an answer outside of decoupling Maybe stop relying on IP as your business strategy ? Always be innovating so that you always be one step ahead those who copying.

If you have to keep doing that why would you. If I wanted to start a company the smart thing to do would create a company called Orange Computers, steal a modified version of iOS call it iOP and then undercut apple because I didn't have to pay for RnD

You can but you are in mercy of Apple for the product roadmap or future update and you may not understand the product as intimately as Apple. They may also have server side components that would be very difficult to copy.

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#135
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Land is just an export like any other. China produces lots of manufactured goods, and sells them to the US. The US produces tons of valuable urban real estate and exports it to China. (Similarly the US produces lots of higher education, and exports it in the form of international students)

> Land is just an export like any other. i'm in the market for a few TEUs of US land, preferably downtown san francisco. i'll pick it up in Hamburg or Antwerp and would like a house on it. sarcasm off - just no.

ask the residents of Vancouver, BC what they say about this

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#136
post #115
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Feel free to suggest one. Even things like Patreon likely would not work without copyright, as people would just steal the work and republish it on another medium. Open source business models couldn't work without copyright, and there is a minor rebellion underway in OSS against highly permissive licenses due to rampant corporate exploitation (e.g. "SaaSification" and rebranding and commercialization that robs the au…

Some strategy I can think of: be the first to market, market yourself as the original creator, constant innovating, other people can copy but they can't control the updates and product roadmap, and you have the advantage of intimate knowledge of the product. Another strategy is to create personalized custom solution. This would be hard to copy, unless you can copy the creator brain.

So, you are saying to brand yourself but what stops someone from copying your brand and marketing?

Also, not all business can be personalized solutions (would you want a custom car that no mechanic knows how to fix?), furthermore you lose economies of scale, which is a major reason why most companies are viable outside of tech.

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#137
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I can't see an answer outside of decoupling Maybe stop relying on IP as your business strategy ? Always be innovating so that you always be one step ahead those who copying.

How do you out-innovate a country which has less regulation, more intrusive surveillance, more factories ready to churn out whatever you invent, more workers (and Uighur slaves) ready to do the labour for less, and no qualms about stealing anything and everything you come up with and copying it at a scale you can't possibly match?

Perhaps we could stop dismantling the domestic economy by implementing policies that reward domestic investment? Huge swaths [0] of the country are losing their livelihoods due to offshoring and monopolistic practices.

[0] https://policybynumbers.com/economic-stagnation-and-electora...

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#138
post #3

The article gives several possible ways to improve the situation. However, one critical way is missing imho: China forces foreign investment to always come in the form of a joint venture with a Chinese company. This practice needs to be forbidden or heavily penalized in all future trade agreements and similar international contracts.

I just learned that Tesla in China does not have a local partner. Which surprised me. Was Tesla an exception? Are there others? Regardless, I'm absolutely certain that China is exfiltrating every morsel of IP. As state policy. It's what they do. The only interesting wrinkle to me is that Elon Musk is probably okay with the knowledge transfer. A man on a mission. Whatever it takes to get humanity carbon neutral asap.…

Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOEs) are not an uncommon way for foreign companies to operate in China, and Tesla is definitely not an exception. According to data from the Chinese ministry of commerce, WFOEs accounted for about 74% of all import/export by companies with foreign investment in the first half of 2020 http://project.mofcom.gov.cn/1800000121_33_13497_0_7.html

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#139
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have to keep doing that why would you. If I wanted to start a company the smart thing to do would create a company called Orange Computers, steal a modified version of iOS call it iOP and then undercut apple because I didn't have to pay for RnD

You can but you are in mercy of Apple for the product roadmap or future update and you may not understand the product as intimately as Apple. They may also have server side components that would be very difficult to copy.

Why would he care? He makes his money and if, for whatever reason, he can't continue copying Apple, he can simply ditch the company and start a new clone of a different product.

Re: How Chinese Officials Hijacked My Company

#140
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one cares if you're the original if someone is offering the product for half the price because they paid $0 for R&D. This is a really pathetic viewpoint to hold and I wonder if you actually live your life by these standards.

Like I said, if you are the original creator you have advantage the copier doesn't have. Another way is to provide customized personalized solution. That would be very hard to copy. How is these pathetic? Either way you have to adapt or left behind.

Yes, that is what you said, and I think it is quite wrong. Being the original creator doesn't mean much when others can copy your design and not pay any of the costs associated with developing it in the first place.

Personalized solutions might work for some products but not for others.

It is pathetic because it treats illegal behavior as if it you are powerless to stop it. It would be like if your house kept getting broken into, and someone gave you advice to stop owning things, instead of say putting up security cameras, strengthening the locks on your door, or buying a gun or guard dog. I can only imagine you've never created a single thing in your life if you think that other people automatically have a right to take whatever you do and do whatever they want with it.

"Adapt or be left behind"...of what? Once people steal the IP, it is unlikely they are going to all of the sudden become great innovators in the field. At best, they are going to just keep producing shitty knock offs until there is no market left for them. In that sense, progress stops because no one will take the effort to build something because someone else can just come along and copy it. So there is no getting left behind. There is just shitty people siphoning off the work of good people and slowing their pace to zero.

How about the adapting is putting sanctions or restrictions on companies that engage in corporate espionage?

I'm really curious what you do for a living, and how you would feel if your work product was just stolen and ripped off and then used to attempt to shut down your living.

Post reply on HN