Live data from Hacker News

Windows98 Running in the Browser

copy.sh

131–140 of 271 posts

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#131
post #108

Does anybody have a reasonable explanation why windows 10 requires a SSD and so much ram? I wish a kernel engineer could give a good answer to that question. One side of the answer could be that the software that is bigger, but honestly that doesn't explain everything. I wish somebody could confirm Wirth's law is real and that there are valid example of it.

Does it require an SSD? I'm pretty sure my desktop pc doesn't have one and its running win 10?

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#133
post #108

Does anybody have a reasonable explanation why windows 10 requires a SSD and so much ram? I wish a kernel engineer could give a good answer to that question. One side of the answer could be that the software that is bigger, but honestly that doesn't explain everything. I wish somebody could confirm Wirth's law is real and that there are valid example of it.

The anti-malware measures in modern Windows are at least part of the issue.

There was an interesting conference video exploring this, about eighteen months ago. It was part of a project to make git faster on windows. I can't find it, maybe someone else will remember.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#134

Back when the system settings could be reached with less clicks, were organised in a logical way and didn't use most of the screen as white-space.

Only if you use just a mouse. Usually I'll just hit a windows key, type a keyword related to whatever I'm looking for and it's there.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#135

Back when the system settings could be reached with less clicks, were organised in a logical way and didn't use most of the screen as white-space.

I can't wait for the end of this era of whitespace obsession. I'm convinced it was never about design aesthetic, but just a ploy to expand the scrolling distance for legitimate page content within which one can place more advertising.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#136
post #104

To me, still the best UI/UX OS experience. That menu organization is just perfect. Everything is crystal clear about what is selected or not. No idea why the OS moved from this layout.

yes. in my opinion though, windows 2000 was the pinnacle. it had the user experience of windows 98 but was also a lot more stable.

Non-NT Windows didn't support memory protection. That's the main reason why it was much more stable. Programming on Windows 98 was a nightmare. If you, for example, went too far with your `i++` you could've crashed the system.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#137
post #77

Here is something that I stumbled upon that I think was a big loss: HTML Help [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Compiled_HTML_Help ] It's unfortunate that Microsoft didn't work toward making it an open source standard for documentation. We'd have avoided every other documentation having it's own format, style, etc... Plus you get the whole documentation in a single file, not worrying about broken stuff, missi…

I remember when you could bypass the login prompt and open a web browsing session by going to HTML Help. If I recall correctly you could run executables from the resulting browser's address bar too.

I think that was still a bug in Windows XP.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#138
It's funny how I find Win98 more user friendly and logical than Win10. Just look at the start menu where thing are sorted in folders. No ads optimizations anywhere. Just an annoying shortcut on the desktop for MS Internet.

Is it possible to make a program like the sheep.exe nowadays? It is awesome.

Re: Windows98 Running in the Browser

#139
post #88

Back when the system settings could be reached with less clicks, were organised in a logical way and didn't use most of the screen as white-space.

You mean before windows tried to be designed as a a tablet OS while being on desktop for 8.0, failed on both as easily predicted, and then refused to admit the mistake ever since beside the one mandatory change of adding a normal start button / menu back? That full screen start view was one hell of an abomination....

Sadly the current start menu is far from normal. Normal would a simple menuized view of a folder hierarchy, what we have is some abomination tied into the Windows Store in mysterious ways that cause it to break under a wide variety of circumstances in such a way that an in-place reinstall is the only sure-fire fix.
Post reply on HN