Live data from Hacker News

Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

appleinsider.com

131–140 of 148 posts

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#131

Still to be confirmed, I don't usually take "analyst predictions" too seriously but I found this interesting: "Apple will no longer be held to the whims of Intel" Apple switched to Intel because IBM couldn't ship a good enough G5 for notebooks and for scale issues. Given that Intel is not on track with 7nm and rumours of their CEO being seen in Taiwan the other day it seems history is repeating itself.

It’s not just that IBM couldn’t ship a mobile-friendly G5, but that Motorola couldn’t ship any improvement over the G4 fast enough because laptops were an afterthought for their primarily embedded-centric business. Intel is one of two suppliers for nearly every laptop CPU sold today. If Apple was just disappointed with Intel they could switch to AMD instead. Either way they wouldn’t fall behind the rest of the person…

There's also VIA making x86 CPUs and some chinese companies on collaboration with AMD.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#132

Still to be confirmed, I don't usually take "analyst predictions" too seriously but I found this interesting: "Apple will no longer be held to the whims of Intel" Apple switched to Intel because IBM couldn't ship a good enough G5 for notebooks and for scale issues. Given that Intel is not on track with 7nm and rumours of their CEO being seen in Taiwan the other day it seems history is repeating itself.

I agree completely. It’s also the case that ARM core performance is now close to parity with x86. With a little more time, the arm performance curve will poke out above x86 and it will be the perfect time to adopt arm for desktop.

Proof?

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#133
post #46

Yep, the real give away was the A12Z. It isn't shit all faster than the A12X with the exception of the added GPU core. The A12X was so fast when it came out, reviewers were like "holy shit, this is nearly as fast or faster as comparable x86 laptop," and that was what... two years ago? Apple's ARM processors are likely _so fucking fast_ that they'd absolutely be showing their hand if they put one in a tablet right now…

For me, the real question, and pipe dream, will Apple partner with AMD during the transition and perhaps make some some hybrid AMD x86/Apple ARM machines since they're both being built by TSMC? There is an interesting thought. Apple could embed one AMD-chiplet with up to 8 cores into their designs, where Apple provides the ARM-CPUs as well as the io-hardware the chiplets require. This would retain the ability to run…

Bingo! This is exactly what I see happening!

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#134
post #32

I am torn, whenever I hear the rumors about the ARM Macs. On the one side, I am terribly excited from a technology perspective. I grew up with homecomputers in the 80ies, and in the 90ies, all Unix-workstations had several different, non-x86 architectures. So any disruption of the x86-monoculture is interesting. Also, looking at the performance of the iPhone and iPad, I think Apple has the potential to create some gr…

Windows and Linux have already run on ARM for quite a while, both are able to run x86 software while doing so (at a penalty). The main holdback has been lack of desktop class ARM CPUs.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have an existence proof. The iPads are already a better value when you compare price/performance. Even the low end $329 iPad can hold its own performance wise to low and midrange laptops. The high end iPad Pros are cheaper and faster than lowend and midrange laptops.

Are you suggesting that Apple laptops are too expensive for what they're worth? How is moving Macs to Arm going to improve this?

In a capitalist society, something is worth what enough people are willing to pay for it.

Apple pays much more for a Intel chips than its own ARM chips.

Again, you can look at the price/performance of iPads compared to laptop Macs.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The dedicated AES hardware extensions in ARM and x86 cores are probably the same logic anyway, so it shouldn't matter too much who decrypts the data. Maybe it's a tiny bit faster with the T2 though, because then the CPU doesn't necessarily have to pipe all the data through it's buses for decryption then. But that is more or less a feature of having a dedicated separate chip for it, and is thus not tied to the questi…

My thought was this: If the CPU decrypts, it touches every byte being read to RAM, and it touches the data again later when it does actual work on it. If it doesn't decrypt, but a chip next to the NAND does the job, the CPU can DMA-transfer the data directly from that chip to RAM. The first time the CPU touches the data is when it actually does some real work on it.

True, but my thought was that since AES decryption is mostly limited by RAM bandwidth anyways, the transfer from the SSD to the CPU, then from the CPU to the T2 chip, then from the T2 chip to the CPU won't be much faster than transferring from the SSD into the RAM, then decryption, then it being read back into the RAM.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#137
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me, the real question, and pipe dream, will Apple partner with AMD during the transition and perhaps make some some hybrid AMD x86/Apple ARM machines since they're both being built by TSMC? There is an interesting thought. Apple could embed one AMD-chiplet with up to 8 cores into their designs, where Apple provides the ARM-CPUs as well as the io-hardware the chiplets require. This would retain the ability to run…

Bingo! This is exactly what I see happening!

Would that significantly increase cost?

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#138
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also, in the pro audio sector it's common for people to spend quite a bit more than the cost of the Mac on Intel-specific DAW plugins.

Citation/example?

Heh, well the list price for Waves Horizon bundle is $3,999 and that's one vendor...

A lot of the plugins those users acquire over time are produced by individual devs or small Indy shops, who may not be around any more or inclined to develop Arm versions of older products. You'll find threads on gearslutz.com where some people aren't upgrading to Catalina because 32-bit plugins aren't supported any more.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My thought was this: If the CPU decrypts, it touches every byte being read to RAM, and it touches the data again later when it does actual work on it. If it doesn't decrypt, but a chip next to the NAND does the job, the CPU can DMA-transfer the data directly from that chip to RAM. The first time the CPU touches the data is when it actually does some real work on it.

True, but my thought was that since AES decryption is mostly limited by RAM bandwidth anyways, the transfer from the SSD to the CPU, then from the CPU to the T2 chip, then from the T2 chip to the CPU won't be much faster than transferring from the SSD into the RAM, then decryption, then it being read back into the RAM.

AFAIK the T2 is also the SSD controller in Apple's architecture, meaning it speaks directly to the NAND. So it should not be necessary for data to first go to the CPU, then to the T2 for decryption - the T2 can transparently decrypt and encrypt while doing the job of offering block-device-level access to the flash chips.

Re: Apple to debut multiple ARM MacBook, desktop models in 2021

#140
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citation/example?

Heh, well the list price for Waves Horizon bundle is $3,999 and that's one vendor... A lot of the plugins those users acquire over time are produced by individual devs or small Indy shops, who may not be around any more or inclined to develop Arm versions of older products. You'll find threads on gearslutz.com where some people aren't upgrading to Catalina because 32-bit plugins aren't supported any more.

I was referring to the "Intel-specific" part of your comment, not the price. I'm a professional composer and haven't ever come across an Intel-specific plugin -- loads of people use AMD. I think what you meant is x86-specific, but as other people have pointed out in this thread and others, it's expected that Apple will provide the ability to simply recompile for ARM. No big deal.
Post reply on HN