Live data from Hacker News

Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

github.com

131–138 of 138 posts

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#131
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve just looked into this - it looks excellent. Can I ask: is this an all-round superior solution to running your own pi-hole? I set up dual redundant pi-holes on raspberry pi 4s on my home network but switching all devices to NextDNS would give me access to filtered DNS even when away from home, plus save me the trouble of running two raspis (including two Ubuntu instances) just for that purpose. Could anyone knowl…

NextDNS is a commercial entity founded by a Netflix employee who is working on a Netflix CDN. Do the NextDNS terms of use address the potential for data sharing between the two entities. Running NextDNS has costs. Given the absence of fees for using NextDNS, it has a commercial interest in collecting information about users. Like other third party DNS providers (middlemen), e.g., Google or Cisco/OpenDNS, NextDNS supp…

> Given the absence of fees for using NextDNS

https://nextdns.io/pricing

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am using pihole and WireGuard. How did you set it up so that you automatically connect back home when you are off your home network?

The WireGuard apps for iOS and OSX have a configuration section titled “On-demand activation” that lets you do this. On the iOS app, I have it set to activate on cellular connection and WiFi connections to routers if the SSID != my home router’s SSID. Likewise on OSX, except for the cellular option.

Awesome, thank you. I am not sure how I missed that previously.

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#133
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> NextDNS is also further away, meaning there will be much more latency for all your DNS queries. It is usually best to run your own resolver, or have a local DNS server in your network. But your local PI resolver would likely have to pass on your request to an upstream DNS server if it isn't cached. Although its negligible, this extra hop would add latency. This is assuming the result isn't in the OS or browser DNS…

I find that about half of my DNS requests hit the network cache and not upstream, which makes it worth it for me.

Your cache would work the same with NextDNS. I'm not sure to see your point.

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#134
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve just looked into this - it looks excellent. Can I ask: is this an all-round superior solution to running your own pi-hole? I set up dual redundant pi-holes on raspberry pi 4s on my home network but switching all devices to NextDNS would give me access to filtered DNS even when away from home, plus save me the trouble of running two raspis (including two Ubuntu instances) just for that purpose. Could anyone knowl…

NextDNS is a commercial entity founded by a Netflix employee who is working on a Netflix CDN. Do the NextDNS terms of use address the potential for data sharing between the two entities. Running NextDNS has costs. Given the absence of fees for using NextDNS, it has a commercial interest in collecting information about users. Like other third party DNS providers (middlemen), e.g., Google or Cisco/OpenDNS, NextDNS supp…

There is absolutely no affiliation between Netflix and NextDNS.

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#135

Who is this for, what's the point? If you're using a computer on which installing this software is an alternative, you can install a web browser with an ad blocker, which performs much better than DNS based filters. If you're not using such a computer, Pi-Hole proves DNS filtering and this software doesn't. What's the use-case between these two that isn't already covered?

> Who is this for, what's the point?

People who want to learn and/or want something simple. This version is super simple with the whole application being a ~150 line shell script. This makes it very easy to understand and adapt.

Eg. I have a file-server that runs our DHCP and DNS. I've looked into using Pi-hole's setup on it before and it just wasn't worth the trouble due to mismatches between their setup and mine. OTOH this version is very easy to understand and tweak to my needs (eg. using unbound vs. dnsmasq).

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pi-hole already does that. You can run pi-hole on your local OS with Docker. It's 5 minutes to install.

Aside from competition being a good thing, Docker itself introduces attack vectors.

Surely not more so than curling scripts from the web and executing them as root, which is the exact install procedure described for this program.

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aside from competition being a good thing, Docker itself introduces attack vectors.

Surely not more so than curling scripts from the web and executing them as root, which is the exact install procedure described for this program.

IMHO, it's way easier to check the script content before sudoing and validate its security than validate the Docker ecosystem.

Re: Maza – Like Pi-hole but local and using your operating system

#138
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find that about half of my DNS requests hit the network cache and not upstream, which makes it worth it for me.

Your cache would work the same with NextDNS. I'm not sure to see your point.

yes but in pi-hole case my cache is in my local network, in nextdns case it is far away on the internet
Post reply on HN