Live data from Hacker News

An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

old.reddit.com

131–140 of 376 posts

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wish Reddit had gone the way of VLC -- keep your core product, the thing people liked, and stop chasing profits. Why do so many of these companies fall to the profit motive and lose their "soul"?

Paying staff? Hosting costs? Recouping money for the time they spent on it?

Profits != growth. They must've already been profitable to have survived for 14 years.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paying staff? Hosting costs? Recouping money for the time they spent on it?

Right? It's almost as if they have expenses to pay for. They provide value and they're entitled to earn a profit off of it. As a small business owner myself, I'm surprised by the amount of people who expect everything to be free.

The problem with this change is not that Reddit has costs that they are trying to recoup. The problem for me is that much of the user-generated quality content that Reddit is trying to monetize was created, by users, under certain assumptions. Then those assumptions were changed for a short-term monetization gain.

If they initially said that they will be requiring sing-in to read comments, push app over browser, etc. it would be just fine (but then I suspect they would not have any quality content to monetize). Just my 2c.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#133
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until you are like in HK and need to organize yourselves for some reason. > If we're not going to pay with dollar bills, we pay with privacy. Paying with ads is also possible.

But if you pay with ads, don't you need to see a LOT of ads, unless your privacy is compromised and they use trackers about you to give you targeted (i.e. more lucrative) ads?

I'm not sure what it costs to have a service running and what non-tracking adds may yield nowadays.

So: not sure.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paying staff? Hosting costs? Recouping money for the time they spent on it?

Right? It's almost as if they have expenses to pay for. They provide value and they're entitled to earn a profit off of it. As a small business owner myself, I'm surprised by the amount of people who expect everything to be free.

reddit was once a small business in 2016 that turned plenty profit. Then someone got it into their head to turn it into a VC company, quintupled the headcount, took $150M investment from China, you know how it goes.

So now you have a whole bunch of people doing a reenactment of Silicon Valley, only the actual site experience for users has basically not changed since 10 years now (except "corporate innovations" like nagging you to install their app so people playing startup have their hockeystick curve).

It's a common phenomena. Look to Strava or Patreon, perfectly successful businesses that are instead exploding headcount and spending like a cancer, while never actually changing the core experience (except for worse).

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#136
post #52
post #3

They've been making increasingly more user hostile choice lately. Digg lessons weren't apparently not learned

Digg failed because Reddit existed. There's no similar social media for Reddit refugees to go to.

Well, there is voat, but not many people can endure the culture over there.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#137
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That wouldn't help. A significant metric Google uses for ranking is relevance, meaning number of historic clicks for a given search term. As users learn that Reddit links aren't useful sources of information, they'll click less, which means the relevance between the search term and Reddit goes down. Ultimately reducing Reddit's ranking, regardless of if the Googlebot is allowed to index the content. People often mix…

Hasn't stopped Pinterest from flooding google image search results.

[deleted]

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#139
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That wouldn't help. A significant metric Google uses for ranking is relevance, meaning number of historic clicks for a given search term. As users learn that Reddit links aren't useful sources of information, they'll click less, which means the relevance between the search term and Reddit goes down. Ultimately reducing Reddit's ranking, regardless of if the Googlebot is allowed to index the content. People often mix…

Hasn't stopped Pinterest from flooding google image search results.

Pinterest needs to be blacklisted from search engines. I'm never signing up for an account there, period.

Re: An account is now required to read Reddit comment threads?

#140
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That wouldn't help. A significant metric Google uses for ranking is relevance, meaning number of historic clicks for a given search term. As users learn that Reddit links aren't useful sources of information, they'll click less, which means the relevance between the search term and Reddit goes down. Ultimately reducing Reddit's ranking, regardless of if the Googlebot is allowed to index the content. People often mix…

Hasn't stopped Pinterest from flooding google image search results.

It isn't a great analogy. Pinterest still provides the content people were after on Image Search (the image). The only thing you cannot do is click it and see related images.

A better analogy might be Expert Exchange. A site that put answers behind a paywall, and fell hard out of Google's search results. Then Stackoverflow came along and took whatever remained.

Post reply on HN