Live data from Hacker News

The Provocations of Camille Paglia

city-journal.org

131–140 of 171 posts

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't the Reimer story support a naive version of biological sex moreso than an acceptance of gender identity?

It supports believing people about what their gender identity is instead of imposing it on them. The rate of attempted suicide in transgender people is over 40% if they are not socially supported. That rate drops to general population levels in trans people who have familial and community support when transitioning.

Link? The 41% figure is usually the Williams survey[0] in 2014, which doesn't exactly say that.

[0] http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFS...

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Relevant article. The plausible deniability of the gesture seems to be part of its appeal to 4chan and Proud Boy trolls. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/09/18/ok-sign-white...

Ok so us normies out here who use the ok gesture and have no idea about the stupid 4 chan meme are going to be considered white nationalists now? Seems like a good way to make a problem where there isn't one.

“Normies” don’t use the word “normie”, and the label of harm applied by the SPLC isn’t prescriptivist, your beef is with the white nationalist Internet kids.

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Relevant article. The plausible deniability of the gesture seems to be part of its appeal to 4chan and Proud Boy trolls. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/09/18/ok-sign-white...

Ok so us normies out here who use the ok gesture and have no idea about the stupid 4 chan meme are going to be considered white nationalists now? Seems like a good way to make a problem where there isn't one.

This is a Pepe flag, MAGA hat plus the “OK” sign with three fingers up.

Again I like Peterson. But keep saying this is a coincidence or innocent photo... I don’t know, I wouldn’t be caught dead in this photo.

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#134
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is absurd. Where on earth are these "racist and horrible" Pepe memes coming from? In reality, 90% of uses of the Pepe character (which is now a fading meme) are as an avatar or highlight of a post's emotion. Seriously, the majority of all Pepes ever posted have been either a sad frog, a smug frog, or a happy frog. People use the meme to help express themselves along with their text, and then people spazz out wor…

One of the most insidious effects of internet news in general and social media in particular is that we latch to information bubbles where people spread material painting "the other" in the worst possible view. It is entirely possible that u/sprafa news feed is a place where 90% of Pepe-related content does consist of "look at what those evil racists are peddling all day long" outrage based like-bait. The sad part is…

You have a point. I’ve only ever seen Pepe in r/The_Donald where it is a vile object

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gender studies did indeed start out this way, dismissive of notions of "biological sex," until the case of David Reimer threw a bucket of cold water on those second-wave feminist theories. David was the victim of a botched circumcision as an infant. His doctors decided to turn an outie into an innie, constructed a vagina, and told his parents to raise him as a woman. He was given "vitamin" pills (actually estrogen) a…

> This was an early factor in third-wave feminism accepting gender identity, which is why almost all millenial and gen-Z feminists accept trans and intersex people and why TERFs tend to be older I don't see why this story would lead anyone to accept gender identity. I also think there are many millenials and gen-Z's who would be classified as "TERFs", and in fact would view the term as derogatory.

It's a term that people have started scrawling on women's shelters [1]. I am unconvinced it is a purely "descriptive" thing...

[1] https://www.facebook.com/252414605231327/posts/7186233552771...

*Edited to be less snarky

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In what sense is Donna Haraway a "highly credentialed biologist"?

Haraway has a PhD in Biology from Yale.

According to Wikipedia [1] her PhD was about "use of metaphor in shaping experiments in experimental biology". This is not what I'd call biology proper. You can have a look at it: it was later published as a book "Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields" which is available online [2]. I'm not sure how [2] makes her a "highly credentialed biologist" (in the same sense that "Structure of Scientific Revolutions" doesn't make Kuhn a highly credentialed physicist).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Haraway

[2] https://monoskop.org/images/5/58/Haraway_Donna_Crystals_Fabr...

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#137
post #30
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not that familiar with her work. But my understanding is that when disciplines like gender studies were being formed they completely ignored biology and nature.in fact there were no biologists in the gender studies departments. And she was one of the first people to suggest that we must study gender with a basis in biology. This is what she may be referencing in the passage you quoted.

Ahem... Do you know about Anne Fasto-Sterling or Donna Haraway? They are both highly credentialed biologists and pivotal figures in the development of women's/gender studies.

I doubt there's much desire around here to argue the merits of gender studies in good faith. However, those proclaiming that gender scholarship doesn't get biology, I suggest you pick up Evelyn Fox Keller's excellent book Making Sense of Life (HUP, 2002) and allow yourselves to be surprised.

(Yes, Keller is a physicist, not a biologist. Those trying to belittle or dismiss what women's studies has accomplished will probably use that to disqualify her contribution...)

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#138
post #134
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of the most insidious effects of internet news in general and social media in particular is that we latch to information bubbles where people spread material painting "the other" in the worst possible view. It is entirely possible that u/sprafa news feed is a place where 90% of Pepe-related content does consist of "look at what those evil racists are peddling all day long" outrage based like-bait. The sad part is…

You have a point. I’ve only ever seen Pepe in r/The_Donald where it is a vile object

Appreciate the courage. Can't speak for Jordan Peterson, but there are some of us that don't have a lot of time for or interest in browsing reddit in general and political subreddits in particular. We very rarely see a Pepe meme.

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#139
post #36

Peterson lost a lot of credibility for me when he took a group selfie with some guys with a big Pepe The Frog flag. I mean it’s kind of funny but 90% of the Pepe memes are actually racist and horrible (from what I’ve seen). After that I couldn’t take his alt-right denialism very seriously. It’s a shame because I actually think some of his talks are quite good.

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20807221 and marked it off-topic.

Re: The Provocations of Camille Paglia

#140
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ahem... Do you know about Anne Fasto-Sterling or Donna Haraway? They are both highly credentialed biologists and pivotal figures in the development of women's/gender studies.

I doubt there's much desire around here to argue the merits of gender studies in good faith. However, those proclaiming that gender scholarship doesn't get biology, I suggest you pick up Evelyn Fox Keller's excellent book Making Sense of Life (HUP, 2002) and allow yourselves to be surprised. (Yes, Keller is a physicist, not a biologist. Those trying to belittle or dismiss what women's studies has accomplished will pr…

I will give it a read.

Fausto-Sterling seems to be loose with data. In The Five Sexes she cites Money as the source for upwards of 4% of the population being intersexual.

Money denied the claim here (last page) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239657377_The_Five_...

Later she revised to 1.7% in this paper with some fairly loose definitions of what constitutes "frequency of deviation from the idea female or male" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.sci-hub.tw/pubmed/11534012

If you dig into the 1.7% figure, 87% of it comes from late onset CAH. Problematic, as Late onset CAH is very similar to PCOS, which affects 5-10% of the population and was excluded. Both fit her definition of deviation from the sexual idea (hirtuisim, infertility) https://i.imgur.com/BYi5dem.png

Post reply on HN