Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hmm, sounds like a fun DOS attack for frienemies. Personally, I'd rather take the risk. Is there a way to disable that?
If everything were backed up to iCloud (it is by default), you can literally throw your device in the trash, get a new one, log in and the new device will look and act like the old device with all of your data in check. The issue was that she had maxed out her icloud account and kept dismissing messages. The blame for that is shared between her parent not ponying up $10 a month for 2TB of storage that can be shared b…
In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
131–140 of 152 posts
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
If everything were backed up to iCloud (it is by default), you can literally throw your device in the trash, get a new one, log in and the new device will look and act like the old device with all of your data in check. The issue was that she had maxed out her icloud account and kept dismissing messages. The blame for that is shared between her parent not ponying up $10 a month for 2TB of storage that can be shared b…
Actually that is not true. They talk like it is a full incremental backup, but it is not. Apple will maintain a list of the apps you have installed. If that app is no longer available in the app store then you are out of luck. Sure pictures contacts and downloads are available, but settings within apps not so much. The move to iCloud over PC backups is great for Apple (the got my money for the 2TB plan, but only sort…
Each app has three kinds of storage:
- files that should be copied to iCloud.
- files that should be permanently stored on the device
- temporary files that can be deleted by the OS to clear space.
The developer decides which types of files should have which retention policy.
iCloud only backs up the first kinds of files per app.
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then you don't understand that when the user is unaware of such feature and can't easily opt in/out, then it's an anti-feature, because sometimes not getting locked out from your own device is way more important than data being safe.
I disagree. If the user doesn’t understand the technicalities, then, I argue that Apple should take control. The user might think that access is more important until the case where you have sensitive data (like intimate photos) at the wrong hands. Apple picks to destory the data of all users. It annoys the majority but protect the minority which has sensitive information. Also users underestimate the sensititivty of…
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#134So the device is locked because Activation Lock (Find My iPad) was enabled. But the root problem is the AppleID lockout. > Apple will not unlock her iCloud account... even though she has never forgotten her password. This is news to me. Why on earth is she not able to get back in if she knows the password? Did she perhaps enable 2FA when "modernizing" her AppleID and lose access to the 2nd factor? That's the only thi…
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your assumption that nobody at Apple cares about the customer's privacy and security is completely ridiculous. The fact that they have a setting to wipe your device after 10 failed pin/password attempts proves that they care about my security and privacy. There's no other reason to include such a feature. Not to mention the secure enclave in iOS devices (and the MacBook Pro and iMac Pro, I think) or Apple's refusal o…
Sure, there’s no such thing as security theater and nobody spends money or effort putting on a show at all anywhere ever.
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, please tells us more about your crime statistics in the states with this more "effective police", and how they're so much better than Europe/London...
I'm not living in the States, so I have no idea about the situation there, but Germany has very save cities. I'm sure you are able to input crime statistics Germany in your search engine of choice, if you are curious.
Overall Crime and Safety Situation
U.S. Embassy Berlin does not assume responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms appearing in this report. The American Citizens’ Services unit (ACS) cannot recommend a particular individual or location, and assumes no responsibility for the quality of service provided.
The U.S. Department of State has assessed Berlin as being a MEDIUM-threat location for crime directed at or affecting official U.S. government interests.
Please review OSAC’s Germany-specific page for original OSAC reporting, consular messages, and contact information, some of which may be available only to private-sector representatives with an OSAC password.
Crime Threats
Crime rates throughout Germany have been comparable to those in most first-world countries, and comparative analysis of crime data for the U.S. and Germany reveals only marginal differences. The Bundeskriminalamt’s (BKA) 2016 Police Crime Statistics for Germany indicated only minor changes in the number of the majority of recorded offenses with an increase of 0.7% overall. This resulted in reported crime being at its highest level since 2005. However, when discounting the “Aliens Act-related” crimes (which saw a 21.1% increase in 2016), a fall of 0.7% in recorded offences was registered. Significant increases were seen in violent crime (6.7%) including murder and attempted murder (14.3%), rape (12%), bodily injury (8.1%) and serious bodily injury (9.9%). Increases were also seen in drug offenses (7.1%) and weapons offenses (14.8%). Significant decreases were seen in burglaries (9.5%), shoplifting (3.3%) and economic crime (5.6%).
Some observers have suggested that official statistics may not always provide an accurate accounting of the level of crime, and not all crimes reported to the police are captured in the form of an actual police report. There have been reports of police dissuading victims from making formal reports citing little chance of capturing the suspect. Such a practice may create a disincentive to report criminal activity. Outspoken representatives of police unions have stated the number of crimes is often drastically under reported. In 2015, the head of the German Detective Union (Bund Deutscher Kriminalbeamter) accused politicians of “leaving the public in the dark as to the true level of criminality.” He claimed that only 75% of domestic burglaries were reported and that sex crimes and cybercrimes were under reported.
There have also been reports of crimes, in effect, being de-criminalized due to their frequency and impact on resources. One such report involved a community declaring petty crimes, such as shoplifting, would no longer be investigated by the authorities. To tackle high-profile criminal activities, such as violent crimes and burglaries, police have reallocated and/or increased resources in certain areas, resulting in less emphasis on investigating and detecting less serious crimes, such as fraud.
It is not uncommon for visiting Americans to be victims of purse snatching or pickpocketing in high traffic and tourist areas (in train stations, internet cafes, crowded restaurants, and outdoor market places), but violent crimes against Americans have been relatively infrequent. Carry a copy of your passport while maintaining the original in a safe location. While personal assaults do occur, there is no evidence that such crimes were driven by anti-American sentiment.
https://www.osac.gov/pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=237...
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, there’s no such thing as security theater and nobody spends money or effort putting on a show at all anywhere ever.
Perhaps you could explain why you think those things are security theater. Then your comment would have some actual substance.
The reason I think that they are theater is the same reason that any corporation does things like that. It’s just like Googles bullshit “do no evil” motto. Apple has a long history of doing dramatic things for attention. Do you deny that?
So, what’s your reason? Do you take everything that any corporation does at face value, or just Apple?
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't blame the user for poor product decisions.
I just don't see this as a poor product decision - the mechanism here is extremely simple - if you lock out your device completely, Apple will only ever unlock it for you if you can prove it's yours. How is it different to cars for example? If I lost both of my keys to my car, Mercedes would only produce a duplicate and re-program the ignition if I could prove that the car is indeed mine. I don't want someone to be a…
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just don't see this as a poor product decision - the mechanism here is extremely simple - if you lock out your device completely, Apple will only ever unlock it for you if you can prove it's yours. How is it different to cars for example? If I lost both of my keys to my car, Mercedes would only produce a duplicate and re-program the ignition if I could prove that the car is indeed mine. I don't want someone to be a…
For cars, in the US, each state (to my knowledge) runs an ownership database, issues certificates of title, and compels buyers, sellers, and users of vehicles to update the database when ownership changes. Apple devices don't have a similar ownership database.
Re: In which Apple destroys my daughter’s iPad forever
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps you could explain why you think those things are security theater. Then your comment would have some actual substance.
What substance did your comment have? You simply named some examples of actions that Apple has taken which doesn’t prove anything at all to your point since the very definition of security theater is taking actions that make it look like you care about security . The reason I think that they are theater is the same reason that any corporation does things like that. It’s just like Googles bullshit “do no evil” motto.…
The burden is then on you to give a reason that you think that wiping my device after 10 failed pin/password attempts is security theater and not just security.
Apparently your reasoning is just that "Apple is a corporation and corporations use security theater", which is a terrible argument. It assumes that all corporations do certain things without room for exceptions. It also has nothing to do with the actions themselves.
> definition of security theater is taking actions that make it look like you care about security.
If the actions you take to make it look like you care about security also happen to make you more secure, is it security theater? Can a company do something that both makes them look good in the public eye and be good for their users? I think they can.