Live data from Hacker News

Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

techcrunch.com

131–137 of 137 posts

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#132
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>> Before anyone says "but OpenBSD broke an embargo before", this is a different project and besides having BSD in the name don't see why they were excluded. AFAIK they all share the same brand name BSD and they are all closely affiliated.

> AFAIK they all share the same brand name BSD and they are all closely affiliated. This is a gross falsehood. They all variously diverged from a parent project, called BSD, in the 90s. Since then they are wholly independent. Because of the common license and heritage, code sharing is often easy and legally unrestricted. But their leaders, policies, and philosophies are very distinct.

But if one BSD get the memo, the other ones will too right ? That's the point.

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#133
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> AFAIK they all share the same brand name BSD and they are all closely affiliated. This is a gross falsehood. They all variously diverged from a parent project, called BSD, in the 90s. Since then they are wholly independent. Because of the common license and heritage, code sharing is often easy and legally unrestricted. But their leaders, policies, and philosophies are very distinct.

But if one BSD get the memo, the other ones will too right ? That's the point.

No, that is also a total fabrication. Please stop making things up.

FreeBSD secteam does not leak NDAed or embargoed information to other BSDs.

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#134
post #39
post #25

I wonder what will the next big security hole. I'm becoming very pessimistic about how I can trust computers. Computers can do amazing thing, but software seems fragile, unreliable and untrustworthy. I have been keeping notes on paper for years now, and it doesn't look like it's going to change.

Internet-connected computers are more secure now than they ever have been. Just take the standard precautions: update your OS and don't install untrusted apps.

I think it's actually the opposite.

Internet is still growing, and so is the computer security economy. Look at all the data breaches and leaks.

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#135
post #25

I wonder what will the next big security hole. I'm becoming very pessimistic about how I can trust computers. Computers can do amazing thing, but software seems fragile, unreliable and untrustworthy. I have been keeping notes on paper for years now, and it doesn't look like it's going to change.

>Computers can do amazing thing, but software seems fragile, unreliable and untrustworthy. Think about how many successful jobs computers have done for you/us compared to how many breaches/failures actually occur. We get overwhelmingly more stuff done with computers than without. Even if I had to attempt to send an email 10 times before it worked, that's much more convenient than walking the actual distance and deliv…

You're right, but computer security can become an issue, and it can do incredible damage. It's a new threat, so it is creating new problems that must be solved, and quickly.

Not to mention the damage it can do to individual people, because it hard to measure.

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meltdown affects some ARM prcessors as well. https://developer.arm.com/support/security-update

My response was in the context of privong stating that Intel and AMD were equivalently affected, when it is specifically Intel that suffers performance degradation in patching due to their unsafe usage of speculative execution.

I only said they were both affected by Spectre. But it wasn't clear if the OP was worried about performance issues or security issues, so it isn't clear on what basis they were suggesting that buying AMD is a solution.

Re: Intel CEO: Patches will come to 90% of chips in the next week

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microcode doesn't control everything the CPU hardware does

I'm aware, that's why I asked. Do you know? Do you have a reference? (And I'll laugh pretty hard if it's confirmed that these super-complex branch buffer adjustments are possible, but simple prefetch filters are just not possible on current Intel hardware.)

No I don't have any reference. But I don't find it soon hard to believe that complex things have knobs while simple things don't.
Post reply on HN