PuTTY 0.68 has been released
131–140 of 152 posts
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't say anything definitive about “overblown”, but I like the change. Windows security model is inadequate, but it's good to work around it anyway.
How is Window's security model inadequate?
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd love to try it, but I'm not in an environment where the build of windows I'm using is new enough yet.
Give MSYS2 a try: http://www.msys2.org/
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#134On Windows 10, with Windows Subsystem for Linux installed, I don't find myself using Putty anymore.
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#135Since I switched to cygwin for ssh on windows I haven't looked back, putty is awful for someone coming from Linux normally and only forced to use Windows for certain things.
I never got around on writing a blag about how to do this, but I like it a lot
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#136Since I switched to cygwin for ssh on windows I haven't looked back, putty is awful for someone coming from Linux normally and only forced to use Windows for certain things.
Yeah. I use a modified mintty-solarized-dark theme for cygwin, and symlinked my windows home dir into the cygwin one. I never got around on writing a blag about how to do this, but I like it a lot
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#137Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#138Putty is great and has been for a very long time. Always glad to see it still in active development. Though, for Windows, once I found MobaXterm I never looked back. Of course on the Linux side nothing to me beats tmux or terminator.
And the SSH part of MobaXterm is based on PuTTY
Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#139Re: PuTTY 0.68 has been released
#140Pretty happy with the Kitty fork of putty, which is a lot less spartan with features. https://www.fosshub.com/KiTTY.html
And I would recommend MobaXterm, definitely also worth to try. http://mobaxterm.mobatek.net/
If you don't need X-Window support, but rich terminal/ssh features, it may be a ($70) try.