Might be a use case for https://datproject.org .
Mirroring US climate data
131–140 of 166 posts
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#132I heard that Trump has given NOAA 100 days to justify their existence, or face heavy cuts. Does anyone know the details? Here is the closest article I could find: http://www.salon.com/2016/11/23/politicizing-climate-change-...
It seems like Trump has been doing similar to quite a few federal agencies. I'm concerned with some of the early moves, but it's going to be interesting, I do hope that some common sense prevails. For example, bowing out of TPP isn't so bad.
* note - i support bailing on TPP, H1B visa reform, and subsidizing clean energy
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#133Slightly off-topic, but my guess is that the next 4 years will be the golden age of privacy (in general), file-sharing and maybe even distributed web & federated services - for the US at least .
Unfortunately it will probably take a huge scandal that baldly and stupidly shows how unchecked those powers are and what can be possible with them. I think Trump is capable of that kind of misstep. Like say SNL writers were PMing each other a tasteless joke about assassinating Trump and the president tweets about it and orders their arrest.
In the end, something dramatic like that could actually have a really positive effect on the consciousness of the public. It could also have a really negative effect where people accept the new normal. It's hard to know.
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you mean the golden age of private infrastructure, or the golden age of folks combatting a non-private infrastructure? Because from my point of view, privacy in the US is only going to continue to get worse (and that's not even necessarily a dig at the current administration).
What I mean is (I guess) people will be seriously considering their privacy - especially online/digital one.
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
In your first sentence which actions are you referring to?
Not OP but the general complaint is that we shouldn't switch from a cheap energy source (coal) to expensive renewables which are relatively untested at scale if the human impact of climate change is minimal or already past the point of no return. I don't personally believe this but this is a not unreasonable argument I have heard.
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
In reply, let me first quote your own words: > There was once "broad consensus" that the world was flat. I am not at all comfortable when there is so much consensus. There needs to be debate, disagreement, and healthy skepticism at all times. The key point is that the flat earthers kept believing (and angrily counter-attacking) despite the solid evidence to the contrary. Post-positivism is not claiming that everythin…
There was never a broad consensus that the world was flat.
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#137Re: Mirroring US climate data
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any good way to timestamp things like this?
Wow, the "Stamper" by Matthew Richardson is still running! http://www.itconsult.co.uk/stamper/stampinf.htm This is pretty close to what you need. Getting an email with SHA256's of an archive of scrapes signed would do the trick.
EFF, or some organization with more longevity than a single consultant should build something similar.
Re: Mirroring US climate data
#139Although NoScript and uBlock Origin show nothing being blocked, I still end up with a blank page when trying to view this site. Maybe it's a Pale Moon thing.