Live data from Hacker News

A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

arxiv.org

131–140 of 155 posts

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#131
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's very nice, however much too inactive for most people to use regularly.

Which is good. Fuck most people. They can stay here and on Le Reddit

HN isn't so bad... Reddit, that's debatable. Some think it's too PC, and others think it's not PC enough. Myself, I miss the days when communication platforms like Usenet could be common carriers.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#132

It's rather disappointing that the authors didn't talk about the biggest thing that has reshaped discussion in 4chan since years. The reply indicator. For people who don't go to 4chan, you can read it on http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/you-here-s-your-you . Basically, if someone else replied to your post, the post pointer will show a (You) word, showing that the poster replied to a post that you wrote. Moreover, the po…

No, it's disappointing that 4ch is getting any attention, because attention has always been the cancer that is killing X. I suppose network effects can also work against you...

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

/g/ makes useful software on occasion for example. after 4chan pioneered webm as looping gif replacement (long before imgur doing the gifv thing) they made webmcam and webm4retards for example. The latter by its mere existence also highlighted github's overzealous application of community policies. A bunch of indie games started their life there too. And then there are derivative and mashup works like fanart, transla…

But we could apply the reverse Sturgeon's law: in any sufficiently large community, 1% of content will not be crap. 4chan is not special, it's just large.

Facebook is my counter example. Its the biggest social media site on the internet. Produces nothing that gets reified in the form of internet culture.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#135
I don't like to be mean but I honestly don't see /pol/ has a big influence in the election or politics like some commentors have stated. First, most of the action /pol/ does outside of their board is mostly on Twitter and various open polls. I've never seen /pol/ do anything close to real life action. Not a single event or protest IRL. Not even a letter writing campaign. Just posting image macros. It's all in good fun I'm sure, but they're not going to change the opinions of voter blocs with Rare Pepes that's for sure.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is disturbing to say the least. Which group of "rebels" is this? There's a lot of factions here in play, some of which are downright scary, but others of which are just fighting to survive. Not that 4chan cares about these things. They just want to see people blown up.

>Not that 4chan cares about these things. They just want to see people blown up. You understand 4chan isn't a single hive mind right? Each board has its own culture, and even moreso: each general thread has it own subculture. /sg/ (Syria General) is one of the best place to get data on the Syrian civil war. The folks there aggregate data from a massive set of sources and include people who actually live in Syria or c…

The problem with communities, online and otherwise, is they develop a certain prevailing attitude. These can either be weak (e.g. Reddit, 4chan) or strong (e.g. /r/The_Donald, /pol/) depending on how you delineate these.

You can make a case that /sg/ is a good source of news, but it's part of 4chan. I'd rather follow individuals doing reporting on something more neutral like Twitter.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving military "intel" from 4chan is absolutely insane. These were the same people that thought they'd conclusively identified the Boston Marathon bomber, but were totally wrong.

It's not like they could send UAVs to verify if the claims are legit? It's literally written on the screenshot that the Russians sent drones; and Ivan is obviously a Russian intelligence officer. Breathe!

Russians have demonstrated time and time again they will shoot first and ask questions later, and many times they don't even bother asking questions.

US intelligence is not always as rigorous, either, don't get me wrong, but the Russians in Syria seem to have very loose definitions of what qualifies as a target.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#138
post #28

"9. RARE PEPES In this Section we display some of our rare Pepe collection." Things that you have never thought would appear on a bonafide research paper for 800$. EDIT: 4Chan thread regarding this paper, this is worth the read on it's own. http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/92612923/a-longitudinal-m...

The best is Footnote 2: "For readers unfamiliar with memes, we suggest a review of the documentary available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ ."

"The uploader has not made this video available in your country."

Germany is full of surprises so far.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Giving military "intel" from 4chan is absolutely insane. These were the same people that thought they'd conclusively identified the Boston Marathon bomber, but were totally wrong.

I'm pretty sure that was Reddit [1] [1] http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www...

Just for the record, reddit ran with it after picking it up from (I think) the police scanner.

Re: A Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and its Effect on the Web

#140
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty sure that was Reddit [1] [1] http://wayback.archive-it.org/3649/20130422194045/http://www...

Just for the record, reddit ran with it after picking it up from (I think) the police scanner.

This is true. I remember firsthand the #scanner hashtag on Twitter and various re-streamers broadcasting the scanner online, as CNN and other outlets were trying to confirm facts and keep up coverage.

It was a surreal experience, and it showed both the strengths and weaknesses of crowdsourced tweets as "news". You get a lot of info, about how people think and feel but the facts being thrown about can be faulty and need to be confirmed independently. It wasn't until the unfortunate events in Ferguson a year and a half later than a similar kind and intensity of social media coverage ensued.

Post reply on HN