Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are SDI and ATL?
Samsung SDI is their battery manufacturing subsidiary. ATL is Amperex Technology Limited, a Chinese battery manufacturer.
FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
131–138 of 138 posts
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#132Big gubmint taking away my liberty to burn up an airplane full of passengers with my shoddy cell phone. Trump will fix this.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder why they aren't being banned, the way that hover boards were (though I believe the fire risk for the Note 7 is only present while charging)
It would be unenforceable. You can't make airport staff verify that the passenger is using a Pixel C or Xperia Z4 rather than a Galaxy Note. You'd be lucky if they don't just call them all iPads.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder why they aren't being banned, the way that hover boards were (though I believe the fire risk for the Note 7 is only present while charging)
It would be unenforceable. You can't make airport staff verify that the passenger is using a Pixel C or Xperia Z4 rather than a Galaxy Note. You'd be lucky if they don't just call them all iPads.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me too. I fly a lot, and the thought of a damaged battery, or somebody leaving their notebook in sleep mode, packed in a suitcase of flammable clothes with all of the other luggage gives me anxiety at times. If I have both laptops with me, I check the heavier one, but take the battery out and carry it on. I fly from Hong Kong to the US quite a bit (16 hours), so alternate landing sites are few and far between. That,…
> but take the battery out obviously not a mac user
I did have a 2011 Macbook that did heat up quite a bit, but I always carried it on for fear of damage and theft back then.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Flammable clothes is kind of an oxymoron. Pretty much any textile intended to be work gets treated with flame retardants.
And they're washed off during the first machine wash. Your point is?
I don't know of any reports of fires in luggage holds.
I know there are fire suppression devices as mandated by the FAA. It used to be just containment, but they changed it to suppression thank goodness.
Nonetheless, I vote for carry-on where you can see it before a single-point failure occurs with the fire suppression system unseen in the luggage hold. I can imagine the fire suppression system either not being charged or armed from my related experience with safety issues in the hospitality industry.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Airports around the world must make a fortune selling bottled water. That rule is never going away no matter how stupid it is :-(
I've yet to step foot in an airport that didn't have water fountains, and won't let you take an empty reusable bottle through security. There's no need to buy bottled water.
Re: FAA Urges Passengers to Not Use Samsung Galaxy Note 7 on Planes
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me too. I fly a lot, and the thought of a damaged battery, or somebody leaving their notebook in sleep mode, packed in a suitcase of flammable clothes with all of the other luggage gives me anxiety at times. If I have both laptops with me, I check the heavier one, but take the battery out and carry it on. I fly from Hong Kong to the US quite a bit (16 hours), so alternate landing sites are few and far between. That,…
And yet, this has never happened.
And here's one where the crew of a UPS cargo plane lost their lives due to a fire with rigin located near a pallet containing some lithium batteries in the main deck cargo area. Granted fire suppression was not there I think, but you get the picture [3].
I have not worked in the airline industry, but the above incidents were reported, and were highly-visible, occurring in the passenger cabin. I wonder if there are any unreported incidents of the fire suppression system going off in the cargo/baggage hold? I'll have to read through the source material more.
I know it's speculative, but I say it having worked in a high-risk job where minor incidents like paper cuts and stapler accidents were reported by the front office, but much more serious incidents occurred in the underwater work we did, and did not get duly reported. Safety is a diligence game, and we tend to get jaded by daily 'minor' incidents until a big one occurs and rattles everyone to muster, or it sees the light of the press & public.
[1] http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/A320,_vicinity_New_York_J...
[2] http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/B738,_en-route,_Colorado_...
[3] http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/B744,_vicinity_Dubai_UAE,...