This is disturbing despite it being "optional", because it's a place for border agents to push in the entry interview. "I noticed you didn't fill out the question regarding online identity. Do you have an online identity?" Sure, you can (and should) tell the agent that's all personal information, but that may also lead to further hassles and delays.
You also shouldn't say that you don't, if you have... as this would be "fraud to gain access to the USA" which is a good way to never gain access to the USA. Therein lies a problem, just what is a social media account? Is it Facebook and Twitter? Or does it extend to networks like LinkedIn? Or forums like Hacker News? Do you have a Facebook account, if you believe that it has been deleted but you also suspect that te…
US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
131–140 of 174 posts
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#132Is having an HN or Reddit account considered social media?
Which also counts.
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Edgy. But really, your comment just cheapens the discussion.
I disagree with you that his comment cheapens the discussion. I do think that your comment cheapens it. His point that the US military, with its illegitimate wars, torture practices, and widespread murder of civilians, is reasonably considered to be a terrorist organization is a reasonable and good comment which advances the discussion intelligently and productively. The fact is that US military are in fact terrorist…
In fact, I think Switzerland may be the only country in the world not considered to be terroristic, purely because of their lack of involvement in any major modern wars.
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#134> "Are you a terrorist or affiliate with a terrorist organization?" Sir, yes, sir! I was part of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, sir!
Edgy. But really, your comment just cheapens the discussion.
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Edgy. But really, your comment just cheapens the discussion.
I disagree with you that his comment cheapens the discussion. I do think that your comment cheapens it. His point that the US military, with its illegitimate wars, torture practices, and widespread murder of civilians, is reasonably considered to be a terrorist organization is a reasonable and good comment which advances the discussion intelligently and productively. The fact is that US military are in fact terrorist…
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#136> "Are you a terrorist or affiliate with a terrorist organization?" Sir, yes, sir! I was part of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, sir!
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is already precedent for criminalizing dissent -- Turkey, for example, considers online criticism of Turkey as equivalent to damaging national security by spreading propaganda with the intent to provoke attacks towards the Turkish government. It would be fair to assume the US would be open to such means to improve security.
No, it wouldn't. The US has a long, deep tradition of not criminalizing dissenting views. Exceptions like the Alien & Sedition acts or the "Red Scare" are remarkable because they're so counter to that tradition.
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#138Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#139> "Are you a terrorist or affiliate with a terrorist organization?" Sir, yes, sir! I was part of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, sir!
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11984942 and marked it off-topic.
Re: US Customs wants to collect social media account names at the border
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Edgy. But really, your comment just cheapens the discussion.
I disagree with you that his comment cheapens the discussion. I do think that your comment cheapens it. His point that the US military, with its illegitimate wars, torture practices, and widespread murder of civilians, is reasonably considered to be a terrorist organization is a reasonable and good comment which advances the discussion intelligently and productively. The fact is that US military are in fact terrorist…
Please don't post shrill ideological denunciations to HN. It's not what this site is for, there's no substantive argument that requires it, and one needn't be a militarist to know that.