Earlier quoted context omitted.
...extra tax for high-sugar products?
We tried a tax on fatty foods in Denmark and it was a huge mess. People would just drive to Germany to get the stuff, and managing it was an administrative nightmare: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/business/global/fat-tax-in...
Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
131–140 of 347 posts
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#132The other day I went to buy some canned refried beans. When I read the label, I noticed that it contained refined sugar. WTF?!? There should be no need for sugar in refried beans! After recovering from the shock, I went to another grocery store, where I found refried beans without sugar. Why does this happen? Obviously, sugar tastes good. That has to be why companies add it to all sorts of things. However, if most pe…
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
That video cuts off right before Brabeck states his own view. Thanks for proving my point that his quote is often taken out of context. Here's a longer one https://youtu.be/7iGj4GpAbTM?t=192 He states that he thinks it would be better to give water a price so that we are aware of its value, and take specific measures to provide access to water to people who can't afford it. Not the worst idea ever to fight water wast…
I doubt people in third-world countries are unaware of the value of clean water.
But sure, if you need to confirm the BigCo CEO as incarnation of Satan, go ahead...
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really, you don't see any problem here? You said it yourself. It's not _always_ a (direct) byproduct of over consuming sugar. However, it often is.
No, diabetes is often a byproduct of choosing to over consume sugar. Nestle didn't make them diabetic, they did that to themselves. There is no direct cause and effect, producing sugary snacks does not cause diabetes. People choose to over consume to the point they develop diabetes. People's lack of self control created a market, Nestle wants to be one of the companies in that market.
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#135Yamaha wants to sell you noise-canceling headphones, and a motorcycle.
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#136The other day I went to buy some canned refried beans. When I read the label, I noticed that it contained refined sugar. WTF?!? There should be no need for sugar in refried beans! After recovering from the shock, I went to another grocery store, where I found refried beans without sugar. Why does this happen? Obviously, sugar tastes good. That has to be why companies add it to all sorts of things. However, if most pe…
There can only be one explanation: most consumers are dumb. Or other people have different tradeoffs between short-term pleasure and statistical long-term health. You can define that as "stupid" if you want, but I'm guessing there are plenty of things that you do because you enjoy them that you would not do if maximizing health were your sole priority.
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#137The other day I went to buy some canned refried beans. When I read the label, I noticed that it contained refined sugar. WTF?!? There should be no need for sugar in refried beans! After recovering from the shock, I went to another grocery store, where I found refried beans without sugar. Why does this happen? Obviously, sugar tastes good. That has to be why companies add it to all sorts of things. However, if most pe…
I want you to think about all of the food that's in your house. Eliminate anything that you would consider intentionally sugary like candy, confection, soda, etc. Now how much of a time consuming task would it be to scrutinize every label for needlessly added sugar? Consider how many people would be willing to do that to check for some extra sugar?
And that's why, I believe, companies can throw extra sugar in their products without most of the public being none the wiser. Not only would you have to check your current inventory, you'd have to stay abreast of the issue every time you went shopping. If you went shopping for the entire month like me, you'd spend an extra hour in the store reading labels to check for newly added sugar.
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#138Diabetes is not always a byproduct of over consuming sugar and a company producing sugary snacks and diabetes pills does not force or even encourage over consumption of sugar. I don't see what the actual problem is.
The leading cause of diabetes is poor diet. Nestle is selling you foods that if consumed in large quantities will absolutely result in you becoming a diabetic. It's called vertical integration and it's not accidental.
They also advertise it like crazy.
How are these two things meaningfully different?
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#139The other day I went to buy some canned refried beans. When I read the label, I noticed that it contained refined sugar. WTF?!? There should be no need for sugar in refried beans! After recovering from the shock, I went to another grocery store, where I found refried beans without sugar. Why does this happen? Obviously, sugar tastes good. That has to be why companies add it to all sorts of things. However, if most pe…
Your conclusion is arrogant, unfair, unhelpful, and unactionable. To be fair, the "corporations are evil" conclusion is similarly unhelpful.
This is actually a prime example of a coordination problem [1]. We're going to have to do better than just pushing the blame around if we're going to do something about it. For instance, obesity is a bigger problem among the poor than the well-to-do. Why? One of the most trivial reasons is the fact that unhealthy food is also inexpensive!
[1] http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/
Re: Nestlé Wants to Sell You Both Sugary Snacks and Diabetes Pills
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
I doubt people in third-world countries are unaware of the value of clean water.
Oh come on. He is clearly referring to the problem of water being wasted as a valueless common good, mostly in the western world. And indeed, what is happening for instance in California right now can be seen as tragedy of commons problem (see e.g. http://legal-planet.org/2015/07/13/tragedy-of-the-commons-ca... ) But sure, if you need to confirm the BigCo CEO as incarnation of Satan, go ahead...
I have to pay for tap water though.
>But sure, if you need to confirm the BigCo CEO as incarnation of Satan, go ahead...
You don't need Satan when you've got a BigCo CEO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestle_boycott