Live data from Hacker News

Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

brave.com

131–140 of 580 posts

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#131
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

Eich isn't missing the point; he is being practical and not catering to your freeloading and obscure politics.

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#132
post #67
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Diversity, I think, is really important. Diversity of thought as well as all the other kinds of diversity. It's important to be able to work with people who come from different backgrounds, who have different beliefs. I see this on both sides (I see it more often on the left, but that's just because my filter bubble is a somewhat leftish one.. when I step out of that bubble, I see plenty examples of people on the rig…

It's perfectly consistent. Enforcing one's religious views through threats of violence[1] is not the kind of diversity that the left wants. [1] This is what it means to pass and enforce a law.

[deleted]

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right. Sell premium movie ticket prices that do not have ads (although I like previews, those can stay). Sell me a subscription to duckduckgo, payable in bitcoins or similar. Paywall every newspaper website. These are far more honest approaches in my view.

> Paywall every newspaper website. Nearly every newspaper website is already paywalled, and every time someone posts a story from those sites to HN all the comments are people complaining about the paywalls. HN even added a special little link to let people skip around them, because why would we want to encourage people to pay for quality work they appreciate?

No, do it for real. Paywall completely. Keep the Googlebot out too. If people want to read a newspaper, they'll have to hear from their friends how great it is.

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#135
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. Interesting. I'm the opposite. I've yet to encounter an ad that has a hope in hell of manipulating me at all. I couldn't be more dismissive of them. And if I encounter one too often my dislike of the company starts to grow. "It's show time, and you've b…

The manipulation is subtle, but even if we assume ads don't manipulate you at all, they do manipulate people around you and shared societal consciousness - and that definitely impacts most people.

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you. An ad may make me aware of a product of which I had not previously been but it's not going to induce me to buy something in which I had no previous interest. If I'm thinking of Widget Class X Brand A, an ad might make me aware of Brand B and I may eventually purchase the Brand B but I was going to purchase Widget Class X anyway. If I had no interest in Widget Class Z, it doesn't matter how many ads…

What if the ad makes you aware of a "problem" that you didn't know you had that they have a product that can address. Think for example an ad reinforces the underlying fear that you are not social enough because you enjoy programming by yourself. It explains that a pill to help "anxiety" is what you need to be healthy or maybe a class to help you become better spoken will change your life for the better. Many people…

Hell, advertisements for candy or drinks. I wasn't aware that I was hungry or thirsty but that sure looks tasty!

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#137
post #131
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

Eich isn't missing the point; he is being practical and not catering to your freeloading and obscure politics.

I'm not sure replacing a site's ads with your own is beating "freeloading".

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#138
post #131
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

Eich isn't missing the point; he is being practical and not catering to your freeloading and obscure politics.

Freeloading? You're missing the point; we're not catering to your sense of entitlement.

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#139
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

I can't emphasize this enough. Every time someone rattles out a list of "annoyances" regarding ads, I wish that I could plead with them to consider that there's even bigger reasons. Plenty of people try to sell the idea that ads let us have content "for free", and that all we have to tolerate is "a little annoyance". It's insane. If companies are buying ad-space, it's because they expect to get more business in retur…

The yellow pages (remember that old book?) is advertising. Is that coercive?

Re: Brave: Brendan Eich's clean-ads browser startup

#140
post #70

I will repeat this one more time, because Eich seems to be missing the point.[1] I don't adblock for privacy, security, or speed. Those are just nice-side effects. I adblock because I do not want to be manipulated into buying things I do not need. I wonder what would happen if, as a society, we said, "enough, no more ads". Would it really be the capitalist apocalypse that the ad industry is trying to make us believe…

So I think I largely understand your point. But I am genuinely curious to know how you would then get information about products.

Would it be on-demand research only? Would you browse lists of new products [eg the Wirecutter's "Realist guide to CES"]?

I do both of these already, and I do have js disabled on most sites, and I think ads mis-align the incentives of publishers...

But I think that there are demographics that benefit from ad-supported [ie free] stuff more than I do.

Post reply on HN