Live data from Hacker News

The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google

medium.com

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google

#121

I once tried to find out on Wikipedia whether goldfish really have ten second attention spans. I learned that in Nix vs. Heddon the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a tomato is a vegetable, not a fruit.

Our tools have been shaping us for millennia, something that a story by Ted Chiang highlights nicely: http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/fall_2013/the_truth_of... (via HN this week).

Many years ago, someone wisely said that the problem was not computers thinking like people, it was people thinking like computers.

Re: The Fine Art of Bullshit, Killed by Google

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I honestly believe we live our lives for the moments that aren't spent learning. Facts are facts, and that's just about it. This behavior is "fun" because their bullshitting about Steven Tyler led to them meeting up with some girls, going to some bars, and having a good night out. It's weird how all these advancements in technology that were supposed to free up our time have just taken up more of our time. It's sad,…

It baffles me how you can call this convoluted process "learning". It's not. It's rightfully called the art of trivia bullshitting and has nothing to do with learning. It's a purely social process that seems foreign and awkward to a visible majority of the HN crowd. I happen to agree with that crowd, I don't see the fun in it. I don't see the point in it. I wasn't raised to respond positively to this specific situati…

I love learning. It's one of the things I spend my free time doing.

I love being able to hold conversations about things I like learning about or know a lot about -- politics, computer science, programming, whatever.

Still, I can't only have intellectually stimulating conversations all day. I'd lose my social skills.

Humans are remarkably social animals. In all reality, our socialness keeps our society flowing and from freezing. A lot of intellectuals like to think they're the ones who keep computers computing, robots robotting, etc., and rightfully so.

But had we all the social skills of some "intellectuals" I've worked with and gone to school with, our communication would be piss-poor and we'd never be able make it anywhere as a country or planet earth.

I say all that because those people, the farmers, politicians, small business owners, managers (even CEOs!), directors -- people who have to deal with the general public -- didn't grow up only seeking conversations where they "fire pure knowledge" at each other.

They went to bars, partied, made friends, bullshitted, watched some mind-numbing TV, played contact sports, read People magazine... you get the point.

Thing is, some of us enjoy the mundane. Ivory towers are a bad thing. Believing there's no joy the non-intellectual aspects of life leads to isolation.

Post reply on HN