Live data from Hacker News

Polaroid Cube

polaroid.com

121–130 of 186 posts

Re: Polaroid Cube

#121
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed, I understand that fully. My point is that the English language is not prescriptive in practice. In fact, even if you're a prescriptivist, you could easily argue that "its" is a special case, since most English possessives are formed with apostrophe s.

Please stop making excuses for illiteracy. It's nonsense like this that contributes to the decline of educational standards.

If its versus it's implied someone is illiterate, we'd all be completely uneducated because we didn't write in Middle English.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#122
post #62

Finally someone else is stepping into the GoPro market. Good to see competition here. I know the feature sets aren't identical but sometimes worse is better.

Some of you seems to know the market quite well - here is my question: I would like to have a GoPro alike Cam for mostly indoor usage (low light) with exchangeable lenses (for interviews). I have used a GoPro3+B in the past and like its size and app based control. But for low light indoor settings it delivers sub par quality. What would be a better camera for such a setting?

You want something that isn't like a GoPro at all. A NEX-3 or whatever the cheapest non-crap micro 4/3rds camera is would be the least expensive interchangeable lens camera that does what you are describing. Sometimes you can buy outdated models at blowout prices.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#123
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> GoPro is headed in the direction of lifestyle branding. Original content, sponsored professional sports, brand collaboration, etc. That's still just a camera company. All those are marketing/promotionals moves, no money makers or markets. Same for Red Bull I'd say. How much Red Bull makes for selling the drink vs any other endeavour (if it not actually loses money on them).

they make a nice sum on their formula one team, that alone is a difficult feat so i reckon they are pretty business savvy.

Some f1 teams are profitable?

Re: Polaroid Cube

#124
post #32

Finally someone else is stepping into the GoPro market. Good to see competition here. I know the feature sets aren't identical but sometimes worse is better.

While it's in the same consumer market as GoPro, remember that GoPro is more than a camera company in the same way that Red Bull is more than just an energy drink. GoPro is headed in the direction of lifestyle branding. Original content, sponsored professional sports, brand collaboration, etc. So while Polaroid and Sony are welcoming competition in the space, GoPro's market IMO seems more focused elsewhere.

They are moving in that direction because they are going to be swamped by cheaper Chinese clones. Some will inevitably have competitive or better image quality, features, battery life, etc. and GoPro must pivot to leverage of their first mover advantage in action cams.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#126
post #62

Finally someone else is stepping into the GoPro market. Good to see competition here. I know the feature sets aren't identical but sometimes worse is better.

Some of you seems to know the market quite well - here is my question: I would like to have a GoPro alike Cam for mostly indoor usage (low light) with exchangeable lenses (for interviews). I have used a GoPro3+B in the past and like its size and app based control. But for low light indoor settings it delivers sub par quality. What would be a better camera for such a setting?

Doing interviews on a Go Pro is not the intended use case.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#127
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I thought the video quality was extremely high" Actually the video quality looks terrible. Compare the bits actually shot with the Cube (most of the promo video isn't... you can clearly see when they switch to the shots the Cube itself took at ~0:22-0:26 and ~0:42-0:44, notice how they switch away from the Cube video pretty damn quickly, probably because it is so terrible... doesn't even look actually 1080p as a sou…

This is identical to the sentiment against iPod when it first came out. If the design is good, user friendly, and people still like the product, it won't matter if it's got worse specs since they can always improve them in later releases.

The UX for these cameras is basically "hit record button, see red light go on"; I don't think there is room for any player to win on iPod-style usability.

They either need to sell on lifestyle branding (where GoPro is already owning the market) or quality, IMO.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

agree with that. this just seems more user friendly to get started with. much more of a fun impulse buy than a GoPro IMO. I thought the video quality was extremely high, compared with a lot of the other stuff I see on YouTube. also worth noting that there are a ton of retail outlets in the USA which is an added benefit to their distribution strategy.

"I thought the video quality was extremely high" Actually the video quality looks terrible. Compare the bits actually shot with the Cube (most of the promo video isn't... you can clearly see when they switch to the shots the Cube itself took at ~0:22-0:26 and ~0:42-0:44, notice how they switch away from the Cube video pretty damn quickly, probably because it is so terrible... doesn't even look actually 1080p as a sou…

Agreed, sub-$40 Chinese Go-Pro knock-offs offer superior performance on top of their silly cheap price tags.

Re: Polaroid Cube

#130
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they make a nice sum on their formula one team, that alone is a difficult feat so i reckon they are pretty business savvy.

Some f1 teams are profitable?

More are very unprofitable than not. http://www.forbes.com/sites/csylt/2014/05/25/formula-one-tea...
Post reply on HN