Live data from Hacker News

Former Microsoft executive says Ballmer culls internal rivals to retain power

uk.reuters.com

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: Former Microsoft executive says Ballmer culls internal rivals to retain power

#121
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Web strategy? Like media? Does a technology company need to have a content/media component -- which Yahoo basically is. Azure is a decent extension to the MS development ecosystem. Xbox and Xbox Live seem to be doing well -- I don't use either. Bing, while not Google, has it's fans. Where MSFT was late to the game is in their approach to the post-PC era. WinCE/WinMo were "ok" at the time, then the iPhone came along.…

Microsoft has lost; there's no getting back the head start they once had. It's not like Windows 8 is going to set the record straight and grow Microsoft to 10x the size of Apple and Google combined, like it once was. In part, this is because of their utterly flawed understanding of internet and the way humans (not businesses) work. Steve Ballmer is a joke of a CEO; a loud, screaming monkey that thought the iPhone was…

Ballmer has been filmed screaming developers and talked about throwing a chair. MSFT revenues have grown under his time, but the company isn't sexy. Have there been opportunities lost? Yes. To say it has lost? They have many years of mocking their cash cows before all is lost. MSFT has an odd habit of learning and adapting. We will see if that still exists.

It has been awhile but at one point MSFT spent more on pure research than AAPL did on their whole R&D budget. Research takes time, but AT&T and IBM aren't doing much of it these years. Investing in research is another plus, not in the near term.

Re: Former Microsoft executive says Ballmer culls internal rivals to retain power

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Microsoft has lost; there's no getting back the head start they once had. Couldn't we have said the same thing when Apple lost to the IBM PC when they didn't "get" business computing? (the debacle that was the Apple III - a supposed "business" machine)

Yes, and Apple had to completely reinvent itself to get to the point where it is now. Apple then and Apple now are two very different companies.

Apple didn't reinvent itself. It cut products to a bare minimum, invested in an OS (and infrastructure) to move beyond MacOS, and then used that success to invest in and build new products.

It started with focus.

Post reply on HN