Lost opportunity to call it Hal
I'm surprised they didn't use Watson.
IBM Bob
121–130 of 352 posts
Re: IBM Bob
#122Should have been IBM Tom, after legendary IBM CEO Thomas J. Watson. But perhaps they didn't want to sully his name.
It was a bit of a market play and of course has since been completely upstaged by the invention of LLMs, but it still definitely got them the attention they wanted at the time.
Re: IBM Bob
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you search those names you'll find most have a LinkedIn page proudly displaying their many "IBM Influencer" achievements and qualifications. I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality, but just imagine proudly displaying your #1 shill award for all to see
> I realise LinkedIn is a surrealist caricature of corporate reality I don't think it's a caricature of reality at all, it very much is like the large US corps I've worked at.
Re: IBM Bob
#124Interesting they are renting out agent skills. You can pick up "Java Modernization" at $20 a month for "Specialist workflows to help with modernizing Java applications", or "IBM i" for "Specialist modes, workflows, and skills to work with IBM i applications".
Re: IBM Bob
#125Totally reminds me of "HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About'" https://youtube.com/watch?v=9ntPxdWAWq8
Re: IBM Bob
#126Re: IBM Bob
#127Re: IBM Bob
#128Nothing coming out of IBM is worth any attention.
Re: IBM Bob
#129Re: IBM Bob
#130I promise you Bob isn't going to fix the long-term stupidity.