Earlier quoted context omitted.
Parent knows. He makes an analogy, not an absolute equivalence.
[flagged]
I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
121–130 of 488 posts
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#122Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#123Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#124First time I see his picture, and it’s a bit like someone’s revealed the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto when it’s clear they are going out of their way to protect their privacy and stay out of the limelight. My impression is the guy had always better things to do than engage with the greater internet, like thinking real hard and solving difficult problems. Much respect to his work, but even more respect to his work eth…
Honestly, two mythologized figures (Carmack and Bellard). They're good (like, quite good), but as soon as their names come up people start talking about some weird expectation of what they are supposed to think rather than the actual things they did. Somehow, that mythologizing diminishes their accomplishments.
And it is that aspiration you’re degrading with the rush to de-mythologize, as if it weren’t inevitable, under the crushing rush of time, that we in the hacker world had heroes.
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#125I've always had a lot of admiration for Fabrice Bellard, I always wished I was as good an engineer as he is.
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#126I’m asking genuinely: What’s the point of linking to Carmack’s tweet? The intellectual curiosity (what HN is ostensibly about) is all in the quoted tweet (despite it being written like an LLM trained on LinkedIn posts). Carmack isn’t really adding anything of importance or interest. Linking to him feels a bit cult of personality, as if Bellard is deserving of attention because Carmack gave some vague praise with qual…
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
As I say, Bellard is Mozart when most of us can't even hope to be Salieri.
Mozart doesn’t feel right. The code isn’t beautiful and elegant. It’s not built to last (at least for ffmpeg) or be some kind of masterpiece. He writes code to get a job done or tickle some intellectual curiosity. It’s not beautiful but that’s OK. I think Unicorn illustrates one of the issues with his style. It wouldn’t have needed to exist of the QEMU code was architected into neat components. But then writing spagh…
There’s few things I find more pathetic than trying really hard to show who’s best and ranking things that have no business being ranked.
You will find humans are n-dimensional and elude these simplistic categories.
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#128"Fabrice Bellard" by Andy Gocke and Nick Pizzolato https://www.ipaidia.gr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/117-2020-f...
Jesus... has that ever been submitted to HN!? It should be.
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#129First time I see his picture, and it’s a bit like someone’s revealed the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto when it’s clear they are going out of their way to protect their privacy and stay out of the limelight. My impression is the guy had always better things to do than engage with the greater internet, like thinking real hard and solving difficult problems. Much respect to his work, but even more respect to his work eth…
Honestly, two mythologized figures (Carmack and Bellard). They're good (like, quite good), but as soon as their names come up people start talking about some weird expectation of what they are supposed to think rather than the actual things they did. Somehow, that mythologizing diminishes their accomplishments.
Re: I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer
#130First time I see his picture, and it’s a bit like someone’s revealed the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto when it’s clear they are going out of their way to protect their privacy and stay out of the limelight. My impression is the guy had always better things to do than engage with the greater internet, like thinking real hard and solving difficult problems. Much respect to his work, but even more respect to his work eth…
As I say, Bellard is Mozart when most of us can't even hope to be Salieri.