Live data from Hacker News

OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

opencv.org

121–130 of 160 posts

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#123
post #53
post #38

The announcement itself is pure AI slop

What about the post was not up to your standards?

It's not just AI slop, it's a milestone AI post.

gptzero.me rates it 91% AI, 9% mixed, and 0% human. (I've only pasted a portion of the text to fit in the 10000 character free limit.)

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It can offer a ton of user value. There is a whole industry built upon this idea, Internet of Things.

IoT wasn't not built on "send all the data off to a hosted GenAI". It predated them by quite a few years.

The GPUs were doing video transcoding instead of GenAI.

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#126
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The diagrams definitely look like LLM output as well

Tested one of the diagrams: "Yes, the digital watermark indicates that most or all of this image was generated or edited using Google AI."

how do you check?

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tested one of the diagrams: "Yes, the digital watermark indicates that most or all of this image was generated or edited using Google AI."

how do you check?

Just go on Gemini and paste the photo into the chat and ask, it can use SynthID as a tool.

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#128
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YOLO has basically solved that for my use cases for a couple years now. If you want labels that are not in the pretrained labels it's also easy to fine-tune, provided you're willing to label 200 or so images If you need something less restricted to existing labels (say wanting all the red apples, or all cardboard signs) SAM3 is great, as the sibling comment says

> provided you're willing to label 200 or so images A quick note to say that this is also a task you can hand to things like gemini.

Yep- this is what I do. I use a high quality VLM to generate labelled boxes (in my case, around tardigrades in a microscope image), do some light editing to fix the small number of errors, and then train YOLO26 with it. Works great, saved me tens of hours of labelling. It's a bit scary that there is a VLM that works as well as my fine-tuned model (although much slower).

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IoT wasn't not built on "send all the data off to a hosted GenAI". It predated them by quite a few years.

The GPUs were doing video transcoding instead of GenAI.

You can run OpenCV on a GPU-less Raspberry Pi or other IoT device just fine.

And most IoT devices aren't doing video transcoding at all. You're making some very odd assertions in this thread.

Re: OpenCV 5 Is Here: The Biggest Leap in Years for Computer Vision

#130
post #128
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> provided you're willing to label 200 or so images A quick note to say that this is also a task you can hand to things like gemini.

Yep- this is what I do. I use a high quality VLM to generate labelled boxes (in my case, around tardigrades in a microscope image), do some light editing to fix the small number of errors, and then train YOLO26 with it. Works great, saved me tens of hours of labelling. It's a bit scary that there is a VLM that works as well as my fine-tuned model (although much slower).

thats a fantastic strategy thank you, and thanks to all the other helpful posters as well here. do you have any tips for how to choose the base yolo model? or just any generic one will do?
Post reply on HN