Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are misinterpreting what deleting itself as if the authoritial authority over the IP implies ownership but it's not so. It's executing unwanted code to delete files on the end users computer. It matters not a whit who owns the copyright.
Legally speaking, he already said, fuck this shit, sue me then. > "executing unwanted code to delete files on the end users computer" As the author put it: "It's as much "active destruction" as telling someone to eff themselves." Morally speaking, people who sling slop created from things taken without consent at humans who don't want slop can complain about a social contract they already cancelled unilaterally all t…
You cannot nullify the social contract by quantifying what you imagine it ought to be and justifying any sort of misbehavior that you wish to engage in.