Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've long described the bureaucratic authoritarian corporatist state as building fascism from the other direction, ala inverted totalitarianism . But your list is a conflation of a lot of things - some valid critiques, straightforward responses to the open fascism of the Republican party, and some flat out straw men (eg there are no significant numbers of people " dreaming of the lost socialist utopia of USSR "). And…
>eg. there are no significant numbers of people "dreaming of the lost socialist utopia of USSR" You seem to be in the happy group of people who have never visited the Lemmy main site. Although you may be right about "significant numbers" even if that site seems to be full of them. They might literally all be there.
You didn't really address the crux of my point though. I don't think it's worthwhile to discuss the proto-fascist aspects of a small group without political power, in the context of open fascism with significant political power. It would seem to be hollow both-sidesism.