Live data from Hacker News

Everything we like is a psyop?

techcrunch.com

121–130 of 262 posts

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#121

as someone who works does marketing, "first time?" People paying UGC creators to have ads is nothing new. Posting en masse to fool the algo is, but there's alwasy been bot farms. And before that there's still the trick of getting published by a low rated news org, then letting journalist at a more reputable organization let them know of this trending news. And so on til you end up in the NYT. FYI this works even when…

Do you personally like Drake, Katseye? And think they make good music?

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#125
post #99

The fact that I never heard of this indie rock band until two days ago, when I came across three separate instances of it on forums, including on a tech website, is itself a psyop and you cannot convince me otherwise. Because why the hell would TechCrunch of all places write about it, and why the hell would it make the Hacker News front page. But seriously, more than psyop, it’s the stupid recommendation algorithms p…

I heard about them a few times before finally deciding to listen to an album. I can't remember if it was Reddit or Instagram. In each case they were just mentioned offhand in a comment, like I should already know about them.

Ultimately, I kind of hate the guy's voice. Sort of reminds me of... Parquet Courts? Who I don't really love, either.

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#126
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems infinitely more likely to me that this is simple coincidence than something nefarious.

Don’t get me wrong, I agree; but the odds of that coincidence are extremely long.

Is it possible this is due to a memorability bias, where perhaps you’ve done basically the same sort of thing many times before and just forgot about it because nothing noteworthy happened? Then it wouldn’t be as much of a coincidence.

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#128

This is not true though. My two favorite bands from the past year were poorly-attended shows that I stumbled into. You can still seek out good underground, obscure artists - you just have to look for them. Not trying to be elitist - like what you like. I just really feel like little artists need the support. Plus, it feels like there is a bit more satisfying agency and fate in looking for new things rather than being…

Yeah. It has literally never been easier to find good niche music, and that's been true for over a decade. Don't confuse the people playing the marketing game to try to win big with the whole world out there.

It has also never been easier to find bad niche music. The problem is the work required to separate the two.

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#129
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems infinitely more likely to me that this is simple coincidence than something nefarious.

Don’t get me wrong, I agree; but the odds of that coincidence are extremely long.

If you check on average every three years, the odds of you checking the very same day the book comes out are about 1‰, which is improbable but not _extremely_. Add that together with all the probabilities of things that would make you think "wow, that's improbable" and we have pretty high odds of something improbable happening.

Re: Everything we like is a psyop?

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SEO, Reddit and Paid ads probably

I'm not going to optimize content for SEO - been on the other side of that, and I think it creates content that's bland and ineffective. Humans gonna human, machines gonna machine, and I'm not paying for ads. If humans want the site to succeed, it'll succeed. Otherwise, it won't. Such is life.

This man will build a product no one uses and then complain about the world not being ready for his genius instead of using the tools that everyone else uses to give himself a chance at success.
Post reply on HN