Live data from Hacker News

Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

axios.com

121–130 of 276 posts

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#121
post #21

Meta wants to be an impartial platform only and exactly when it suits them to be.

Name one platform that doesn't, and I'm not just talking about lip service.

It's not unilateral but if it is a commercial interest, then I'll agree that it usually is

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#122
post #21

Meta wants to be an impartial platform only and exactly when it suits them to be.

[flagged]

The main problem with 230 is that the courts have decided to treat it as if it removes all legal liability from online platforms, rather than just publisher liability. The way the text was written seems to be intended to protect platform operators from publisher liability but still have them under distributor liability. For example, if you own a bookstore and carry a book that says something defamatory, you can be held liable if you don't remove the book after being informed about its contents. However, a court case soon after 230 passed created the precedent that it absolves online platforms of all forms of liability. This means that if a platform knows it hosts illegal or defamatory content and doesn't take it down, they aren't liable and any legal cases against them will get thrown out due to 230. One of the authors of section 230 later said that "the judge-made law has drifted away from the original purpose of the statute."

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#124
post #21

Meta wants to be an impartial platform only and exactly when it suits them to be.

Wow. Does Zuckerberg have some kind of clinical condition where he just can't imagine how other people might see him? Sure this will slow down the personal injury lawyers finding clients but it won't stop them, meantime it is more ammunition for Facebook's enemies to use against it. It is one thing to do shady business, it is another thing to incriminate yourself. If you were involved with weed and somebody sent you…

language failure on my end: what's a "Q.P."?

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. Does Zuckerberg have some kind of clinical condition where he just can't imagine how other people might see him? Sure this will slow down the personal injury lawyers finding clients but it won't stop them, meantime it is more ammunition for Facebook's enemies to use against it. It is one thing to do shady business, it is another thing to incriminate yourself. If you were involved with weed and somebody sent you…

language failure on my end: what's a "Q.P."?

quarter pound

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#126

Hang on a minute, meta apparently didn't have the time to be checking the content of adverts they get paid to serve when it was child porn, what's changed all of a sudden?

The crypto-“investing” deep fakes impersonating recognizable names are up and running too.

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow. Does Zuckerberg have some kind of clinical condition where he just can't imagine how other people might see him? Sure this will slow down the personal injury lawyers finding clients but it won't stop them, meantime it is more ammunition for Facebook's enemies to use against it. It is one thing to do shady business, it is another thing to incriminate yourself. If you were involved with weed and somebody sent you…

language failure on my end: what's a "Q.P."?

Quarter-pound

Re: Meta removes ads for social media addiction litigation

#130

Social Media, and specifically Facebook / Meta, will go down in history as one of the worst developments in technology in the 21st century. As Frances Haugen stated in her testimony, Mark Zuckberg needs to be removed from the helm at Meta.

I think television has done more harm, politically.
Post reply on HN