Live data from Hacker News

Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

health.aws.amazon.com

121–125 of 125 posts

Re: Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

#121
post #64
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should have pushed it.

at The Planet in Dallas c. 2002 the EPO button was exposed with no cover, and in very very close proximity to the "Exit" button for the doors... one day, a colo customer hit the wrong button on the way out, and uhh, there was an outage

How did you find out about the outage?

Re: Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're also below sea level.

Theres an Energex office building in Brisbane that has a backup generator below sea level. (Guess when they need to use the generator lmao.)

If it's a once in 25 year flood then it won't be a problem for the person who made that decision!

Re: Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

#123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In my experience many middle eastern companies tend to only operate out of the Middle East AZ’s. They’re not backhauling their data and customers to us-east-1. If the goal is to severely disrupt middle eastern rivals, then you don’t need to hit every possible AWS datacenter.

Interesting, I didn't know that so thanks for telling me something new. But why is this the case? Like, saving costs? Doesn't this recent attack on AWS DC does show that they aren't as safe as previously thought especially in a region of conflict. Is there any particular reason as to why this is the case?

No idea what the laws are like but maybe data sovereignty? I'm in Australia and certain industries require Australian data to stay in Australia, which until ap-southeast-4 came along meant relying on one AWS region.

Re: Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

#124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The more interesting question, is how many datacenters are just plonked next to a high-value military target? For infrastructure reasons, we plonk datacenters down next to airports big enough to fly major hardware into, and near where the big oceanic cables come ashore… and for strategic reasons those are also the perfect places to place military bases

You sound like you know things, and I have questions! What are the chances that we see infrastructure move to less-developed-but-more-stable regions of the world? What even are the candidate locations that wouldn't be an absolute headache to set up? I'm thinking perhaps West Africa? Or South Africa if it can stabilize a bit? Maybe other coastal locations that have good-enough transportation hubs nearby?

AWS spreads a pretty wide net - there are already datacentres in Cape Town, São Paulo, Jakarta... You could certainly deploy your app far enough to dodge any regional instability.

However, proximity to money/power tends to be a factor in business, and the bulk of datacentres cluster around US/EU/MENA/China/Japan

Re: Operational issue – Multiple services (UAE)

#125

Amazon usually has 3 AVs per region, looks like there are surviving AVs but the system didn't switch over gracefully. I bet that was an interesting sev2 ticket!

I doubt that there is enough capacity to evict a full AV to another one.

There's supposed to be for many (not all) use cases.
Post reply on HN