Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Another GitHub outage in the same day

githubstatus.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

121–130 of 298 posts

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#121

Post by nfg »

kasey_junk wrote: post #5
noodlesUK wrote: post #3

Can someone in GitHub senior leadership please start paying attention and reprioritise towards actually delivering a product that's at least relatively reliable? I moved my company over to GH enterprise last year (from AzDO) and I'm considering moving us away to another vendor altogether as a result of the constant partial outages. Things that used to "just work" now are slow in the UI, and GH actions fail to schedul…

“ I enjoy GH copilot as much as the next person” So not at all?

Really? I’d be interested to hear more.

Disclaimer: I work in Microsoft (albeit in a quite disconnected part of it, nothing to do with GitHub or Copilot).

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#122

Post by ChrisArchitect »

rpns wrote: post #97
ChrisArchitect wrote: post #65

[dupe] Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46946827

Not quite, that one is an earlier outage while this one started at (or a bit before) 19:01 UTC. The history for today is a bit of a mess really: https://www.githubstatus.com/history

They are all being discussed in that thread, the submitted url is just one of the various incident links on the day. Duplicate discussion.

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#123

Post by ChrisArchitect »

esafak wrote: post #96
ChrisArchitect wrote: post #65

[dupe] Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46946827

No, it's a new outage -- that's the point! Check the URLs.

That's not the point. The point is it's a duplicate discussion of one of a number of incident links being discussed, all over there.

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#125

Post by OkayPhysicist »

zero_shift wrote: post #23
noodlesUK wrote: post #3

Can someone in GitHub senior leadership please start paying attention and reprioritise towards actually delivering a product that's at least relatively reliable? I moved my company over to GH enterprise last year (from AzDO) and I'm considering moving us away to another vendor altogether as a result of the constant partial outages. Things that used to "just work" now are slow in the UI, and GH actions fail to schedul…

As an aside, God, Azure DevOps, what a total pile of crap that product is My "favourite" restriction that an Azure DevOps PR description is limited to a pathetic 4000 characters.

My favourite restriction is the fact that colored text doesn't work in dark mode. Why? Because whatever intern they had implement dark mode didn't understand how CSS works, and just slapped !important on all the style changes that make dark mode dark, and thus overwrite the color data.

I ended up writing a browser extension for my team to fix it, because the boss loved to indicate stuff with red/green text.

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#126

Post by neuropacabra »

9cb14c1ec0 wrote: post #103
zero_shift wrote: post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One hundred ? Did I read that right?

Yes, millions of people running code agents around the clock, where every tiny change generates a commit, a branch, a PR, and a CI run.

I simply do not believe that all of these people can and want to setup a CI. Some maybe, but even after the agent will recommend it only a fraction of people would actually do it. Why would they?

Re: Another GitHub outage in the same day

#129

Post by sisve »

I moved everything on github to a self hosted foregjo instanse some days ago. I really did not do anything. Created some tokens so that CC could access github and forgejo and my dns API. Self hosting is so much simpler and easier with AI. Expect more people to self host small to medium stuff.
Post reply on HN