As long as there are still safety drivers, the data doesn't really tell you if the AI is any good. Unless you had reliable data about the number of interventions by the driver, which I assume Tesla doesn't provide. Still damning that the data is so bad even then. Good data wouldn't tell us anything, the bad data likely means the AI is bad unless they were spectacularly unlucky. But since Tesla redacts all information…
Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
121–130 of 286 posts
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
While I think Tesla should be transparent, this article doesn't really make sure it is comparing apples to apples either. I think its weird to characterize it as legitimate and the say "Go Tesla convince me ohterwise" as if the same audience would ever be reached by Tesla or people would care to do their due diligence.
Tesla (Elon Musk really) has a long history of distorting the stats or outright lying about their self driving capabilities and safety. The fact that folks would be skeptical of any evidence Tesla provided in this case is a self-inflicted problem and well-deserved.
There have never been truthful statements from his companies, only hype & fluff for monetary gains.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
>One crash in this context is going to just completely blow out their statistics. One crash in 500,000 miles would merely put them on par with a human driver. One crash every 50,000 miles would be more like having my sister behind the wheel. I’ll be sure to tell the next insurer that she’s not a bad driver - she’s just one person operating an itty bitty fleet consisting of one vehicle! If the cybertaxi were a human d…
> One crash in 500,000 miles would merely put them on par with a human driver. > One crash every 50,000 miles would be more like having my sister behind the wheel. I'm not sure if that leads to the conclusion that you want it to.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#124Yes on one side Tesla is not transparent but on the other side the author of the article is an hypocrite given they went with the click-bait title "Tesla’s own Robotaxi data confirms crash rate 3x worse than humans even with monitor" Tesla secrecy is likely due to avoid journalists taking any chance they can to sell more news by writing an autonomous vehicles horror story. Given the secrecy we don't know what happene…
It's a pretty logical conclusion to say that numbers they won't share must make them look bad in some way.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#125The comparison isn't really like-for-like. NHTSA SGO AV reports can include very minor, low-speed contact events that would often never show up as police-reported crashes for human drivers, meaning the Tesla crash count may be drawing from a broader category than the human baseline it's being compared to. There's also a denominator problem. The mileage figure appears to be cumulative miles "as of November," while the…
How corrupt and unaccountable to the public is the city of Austin Texas, even, for allowing them to turn in incident reports like this?
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
We tend to defend companies that push the frontiers of self-driving cars, because the technology has the potential to save lives and make life easier and cheaper for everyone. As engineers, we understand that the technology will go from unsafe, to par-with-humans, to safer-than-humans, but in order for it to get to the latter, it requires much validation and training in an intermediate state, with appropriate safegua…
Note: this is in response to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46823760 which is from the same commenter but got killed before there was time to post any links refuting its claims. > The "salute" in particular is simply a politically-expedient freeze-frame from a Musk speech, where he said "my heart goes out to you all" and happened to raise his arm. I could provide freeze-frame images of Obama and Hilary Clinton…
On the other hand, what you're trying to extrapolate here seems somewhat contrived.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#127Tesla has completely fumbled a spectacular lead in EVs and managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And instead of turning it around, we're supposed to believe they are going to completely pivot and then take over a market with far more developed competitors (e.g. Boston Dynamics). That Elon is riding this wave amidst the transparency of the whole thing is the funniest part. It's like watching people lose m…
My theory has always been Trumps grand con was acting like what poor people thought a rich person was like, Elon acts like what morons think a genius is like.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#128Tesla has completely fumbled a spectacular lead in EVs and managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. And instead of turning it around, we're supposed to believe they are going to completely pivot and then take over a market with far more developed competitors (e.g. Boston Dynamics). That Elon is riding this wave amidst the transparency of the whole thing is the funniest part. It's like watching people lose m…
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#129I am so tired of people defending Tesla. I’ve wrote off Tesla long time ago but what gets me are the people defending their tech. We all can go see the products and experience them. The tech needs to be at least 100x more error free vs humans. It cannot be on par with human error rate.
I don't like Elon and his politics, but I'm very grateful for Tesla to have shaken up the car industry. Everyone is better for it.
Re: Tesla’s autonomous vehicles are crashing at a rate much higher tha human drivers
#130The comparison isn't really like-for-like. NHTSA SGO AV reports can include very minor, low-speed contact events that would often never show up as police-reported crashes for human drivers, meaning the Tesla crash count may be drawing from a broader category than the human baseline it's being compared to. There's also a denominator problem. The mileage figure appears to be cumulative miles "as of November," while the…
electrek.co has a beef with Tesla, at least in the recent years.
Let's examine the Elektrek editor's feed, to understand how "impartial" he is about Tesla: