When Every Network is 192.168.1.x
121–123 of 123 posts
Re: When Every Network is 192.168.1.x
#122I recently just changed my default subnet to 10.X.Y.... rolling two random numbers to make it highly unlikely my home subnet through wireguard would conflict with the subnet where I am connecting from.
This works fine for your end. But the issue we are addressing is on the other end, when you don't control the network and need to reach devices. If all customer sites are running rfc-unroutable blocks, you eventually encounter conflicts. And the conflict will likely be with the 2nd one you try.
Re: When Every Network is 192.168.1.x
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just use /24s in the lower-middle range of 172.16. Very unlikely to have a conflict there.
My (very large) corporate network uses 172.16 and 10. heavily, which has lead me to set my docker/daemon.json default-address-pools to 84.54.64.0/18, as it's very unlikely we need to communicate with any IPs in Uzbekistan.
One day somebody working days or nights "helpfully" plugged one of IT's loose office-machine-network cables into one of my little lab ethernet switches which had a vacant spot :\
With separate IP subnets it really kept the traffic from crossing, no damage was done, and nobody ever knew until a PC configured for DHCP was plugged into the lab network, and their router wanted to autoassign an IP address to it.