Vaguely related anecdotes: - I got caught in the mountains for a few days due to landslides in Nepal. The only available information was relayed by phone between locals. People had no idea of what was going on and their vacation ended on the day the road reopened. It caused a pile up of cars where the road had slid off a few days prior. In some parts, rocks still fell from the cliffs above. We flagged a passing car a…
During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
121–130 of 193 posts
Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#122The header image in the article is a 2400x1600 PNG that is 500KB large, apparently due to subtle dithering making it hard to compress. Converting it to a visually-identical .avif (quality 90, 12-bit color depth) takes it all the way down to 15KB.
Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#123Several news sites offer text only versions. https://lite.cnn.com/ https://text.npr.org/ https://wttr.in/ More listed at https://greycoder.com/a-list-of-text-only-new-sites It’d be great if there was some standard that allowed these to be easily found, and supported on the local news sites.
In the Netherlands the public broadcaster still publishes news through Teletekst: https://tweakers.net/reviews/11700/hoe-werkt-het-vernieuwde-...
Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#124Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#125That bulleted newsletter list being the most useful thing says everything.
Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
I looked at a CNN "lite" article, and it includes 560KB of stuff (lots and lots of CSS declarations) in addition to the actual 11KB of article content.
For me in Firefox it only loads the article's HTML (50-70kb) and the favicon (7kb). Are you sure it isn't some addon you have?
Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#127Re: During Helene, I just wanted a plain text website
#128Vaguely related anecdotes: - I got caught in the mountains for a few days due to landslides in Nepal. The only available information was relayed by phone between locals. People had no idea of what was going on and their vacation ended on the day the road reopened. It caused a pile up of cars where the road had slid off a few days prior. In some parts, rocks still fell from the cliffs above. We flagged a passing car a…
Why does Ukraine trust Telegram so much? Seems they share intelligence-worth stuff there.
1. Habit. We're used to use Telegram for everything: news sources, social network, messaging, memes. Telegram has more capabilities than other apps. You can't realistically move your family and friends to another messaging app because of all of that and the network effect.
2. General attitude of all people towards privacy and sharing data: they don't really care. It's "Who would even care about my data?" and "I've got nothing to hide" all the way.
I doubt most of people ever thought about the topic of trusting a messaging app. It's not the framework they operate in.
There are two global psyops done by I don't know who:
1. That Bitcoin is safe and anonymous.
2. That Telegram is super safe for whatever shady or private stuff you want to do.
One of the best marketing campaigns ever.
I would also want to use this chance to alert everyone who uses Telegram that:
1. It's not e2e by default.
2. They use proprietary encryption protocol. You don't have access to code.
3. I don't think Telegram is profitable, I don't know how it can be with that scale. Which makes you wonder.
4. If you open in-message links, you have a chance of losing your account to hackers thanks to the old vulnerability that hasn't been fixed for years. You literally have to check the list of devices connected to your account every 12 hours if you want to be safe.