Ultrasound Cancer Treatment: Sound Waves Fight Tumors

Post by gsf_emergency_6 » Sat, Jan 03, 2026, 8:22 AM UTC

aebtebeten wrote: post #112

gsf_emergency_6 wrote: post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(If we replace fish by "unicellular organism", it might be easier to get to "what kind of (meta)game gets them to multicellularity"?) Note that narcissism is what PH/Kohut is trying to breakup here. I struggle to put egolessness at its foundation, because that smells too much like nihilism. seem s increasingly less healthy to scale nihilistic therapy to a handful, 37 (~Dunbar), 1000s (POUM outer party?) Why not an al…

(fish in the poker sense, if that wasn't clear) Right, I just think Kohut's third box (we are talking about the bottom one, right?) may be just as profitably looked at through the "egolessness" prism as through the "integrated" prism. Looking through the shu-ha-ri prism, I could see the top two boxes as being symptomatic of the "ha" stage: breaking the rules with grandiose intentions usually leads to worthless result…

Post by gsf_emergency_6 » Wed, Jan 07, 2026, 8:53 AM UTC

aebtebeten wrote: post #122

gsf_emergency_6 wrote: post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ELI5 which features of double descent evoked tunnelling to you?

If we look at "twice made dips", we say two times as there is first a dip, then a peak (rise and dip), and then the next dip. This is like when one hops the band gap: there is first a free wave, then one that looks like it dies out, but if it is still a bit big by the end of the gap, then it goes on to the next free wave.

Post by gsf_emergency_6 » Thu, Jan 08, 2026, 4:14 AM UTC

aebtebeten wrote: post #124

gsf_emergency_6 wrote: post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bloch oscillations? Didn't see that coming tbh. ELIgs then

No, not so fancy (do they arise from interference from the internal reflections?). In standard tunnelling, one starts with a normal oscillation, goes to evanescence in the "tunnelling" regime, and then continues with oscillation again once on the low side of the potential; in double descent the test error goes way up (like the potential earlier) in the "tunnelling" regime, and then on the far side comes back down and…